
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro P5000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,220 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 797% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 180W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌795.7% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 45.7 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 180W vs 120W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
2019Quadro P5000
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,220 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 797% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 45.7 vs 5.1 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $2,499 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 180W, a 60W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 267mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌795.7% HIGHER MSRP$2,499 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.1 vs 45.7 G3D/$ ($2,499 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ❌50% higher power demand at 180W vs 120W.
- ❌16.6% longer card at 267mm vs 229mm.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti better than Quadro P5000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Quadro P5000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 252 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 240 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 172 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 162 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 135 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 85 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 77 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 279 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 235 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 173 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 140 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 85 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 68 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 573 FPS |
| medium | 459 FPS | 458 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 344 FPS |
| high | 287 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 286 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 310 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 260 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 300 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 236 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 190 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 136 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 111 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and Quadro P5000

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,747 points. Launch price was $279.

Quadro P5000
Quadro P5000
The Quadro P5000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,728 points. Launch price was $2,499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti scores 12,747 and the Quadro P5000 reaches 12,728 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is built on Turing while the Quadro P5000 uses Pascal, both on 12 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 2,048 (Quadro P5000). Raw compute: 5.437 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 8.873 TFLOPS (Quadro P5000). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1733 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,747 | 12,728 |
| Architecture | Turing | Pascal |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 2048+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.437 TFLOPS | 8.873 TFLOPS+63% |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz+2% | 1733 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 96 | 160+67% |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB+60% | 0.94 MB |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro P5000 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro P5000 has 16 GB. The Quadro P5000 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 2 MB (Quadro P5000) — the Quadro P5000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 2 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 12.1 (Quadro P5000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.0. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+40% | 1.0 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 6th Gen NVENC (Quadro P5000). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 3rd Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Quadro P5000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | 6th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | 3rd Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti draws 120W versus the Quadro P5000's 180W — a 40% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 500W (Quadro P5000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-33% | 180W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-10% | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 106.2+50% | 70.7 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti launched at $279 MSRP, while the Quadro P5000 launched at $2499. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti costs 88.8% less ($2220 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.7 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 5.1 (Quadro P5000) — the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti offers 796.1% better value. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | Quadro P5000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $279-89% | $2499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.7+796% | 5.1 |
| Codename | TU116 | GP104 |
| Release | February 22 2019 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #204 | #206 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












