
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 21.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 55.4 vs 45.7 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌21.8% HIGHER MSRP$279 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 45.7 vs 55.4 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
2019GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($229 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 21.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 55.4 vs 45.7 G3D/$ ($229 MSRP vs $279 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌21.8% HIGHER MSRP$279 MSRPvs$229 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 45.7 vs 55.4 G3D/$ ($279 MSRP vs $229 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti better than GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER make more sense than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 126 FPS | 98 FPS |
| medium | 113 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 97 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 72 FPS | 63 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 116 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 99 FPS | 77 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 54 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 51 FPS | 45 FPS |
| medium | 47 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 35 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 31 FPS | 26 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 272 FPS | 269 FPS |
| medium | 232 FPS | 227 FPS |
| high | 176 FPS | 170 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 184 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 154 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 97 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 105 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 86 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 70 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 56 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 571 FPS | 574 FPS |
| medium | 457 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 381 FPS | 382 FPS |
| ultra | 286 FPS | 287 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 430 FPS |
| medium | 343 FPS | 344 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 287 FPS |
| ultra | 214 FPS | 215 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 286 FPS | 287 FPS |
| medium | 228 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 143 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 443 FPS | 401 FPS |
| medium | 361 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 287 FPS | 263 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 221 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 353 FPS | 330 FPS |
| medium | 290 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 219 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 173 FPS | 164 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 169 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 130 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 116 FPS | 107 FPS |
| ultra | 92 FPS | 85 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER and GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 29 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1530 MHz to 1785 MHz. It has 1408 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 125W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,692 points. Launch price was $229.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,747 points. Launch price was $279.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER scores 12,692 and the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti reaches 12,747 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER is built on Turing while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti uses Turing, both on a 12 nm process. Shader units: 1,408 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Raw compute: 5.027 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 5.437 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Boost clocks: 1785 MHz vs 1770 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,692 | 12,747 |
| Architecture | Turing | Turing |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1408 | 1536+9% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.027 TFLOPS | 5.437 TFLOPS+8% |
| Boost Clock | 1785 MHz | 1770 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 48 |
| TMUs | 88 | 96+9% |
| L1 Cache | 1.4 MB | 1.5 MB+7% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 6 GB of GDDR6. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) — a 16.7% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+17% | 288 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 1.5 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (12_1) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 12 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 3 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 (12_1) | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 3 | 4+33% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs NVDEC 4th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | NVDEC 4th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER draws 125W versus the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti's 120W — a 4.1% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 125W | 120W-4% |
| Recommended PSU | 450W | 450W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 229mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 101.5 | 106.2+5% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER launched at $229 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti launched at $279. The GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER costs 17.9% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 55.4 (GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER) vs 45.7 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER offers 21.2% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $229-18% | $279 |
| Performance per Dollar | 55.4+21% | 45.7 |
| Codename | TU116 | TU116 |
| Release | October 29 2019 | February 22 2019 |
| Ranking | #207 | #204 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












