
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 220W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 242mm, a 13mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,747 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅+73.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌78.9% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
- ❌83.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 120W.
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
2019GeForce RTX 3070
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $220 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 120W instead of 220W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 229mm instead of 242mm, a 13mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅+73.9% higher PassMark G3D performance.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,747 vs 22,172).
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 3070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
Trade-offs
- ❌78.9% HIGHER MSRP$499 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
- ❌83.3% higher power demand at 220W vs 120W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3070 better than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 98 FPS | 158 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 76 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 63 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 90 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 77 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 66 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 54 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 45 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 41 FPS | 67 FPS |
| high | 30 FPS | 52 FPS |
| ultra | 26 FPS | 45 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 269 FPS | 470 FPS |
| medium | 227 FPS | 405 FPS |
| high | 170 FPS | 327 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 277 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 294 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 213 FPS |
| ultra | 100 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 89 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 72 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 56 FPS | 83 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 574 FPS | 885 FPS |
| medium | 459 FPS | 712 FPS |
| high | 382 FPS | 619 FPS |
| ultra | 287 FPS | 499 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 430 FPS | 692 FPS |
| medium | 344 FPS | 557 FPS |
| high | 287 FPS | 473 FPS |
| ultra | 215 FPS | 374 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 287 FPS | 479 FPS |
| medium | 229 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 191 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 143 FPS | 249 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 401 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 326 FPS | 527 FPS |
| high | 263 FPS | 433 FPS |
| ultra | 221 FPS | 385 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 489 FPS |
| medium | 268 FPS | 433 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 339 FPS |
| ultra | 164 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 158 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 119 FPS | 270 FPS |
| high | 107 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 200 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and GeForce RTX 3070

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
GeForce GTX 1660 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,747 points. Launch price was $279.

GeForce RTX 3070
GeForce RTX 3070
The GeForce RTX 3070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in September 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 220W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 22,172 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti scores 12,747 versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 22,172 — the GeForce RTX 3070 leads by 73.9%. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 3070 uses Ampere, both on 12 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 3070). Raw compute: 5.437 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 20.31 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3070). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 12,747 | 22,172+74% |
| Architecture | Turing | Ampere |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1536 | 5888+283% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 5.437 TFLOPS | 20.31 TFLOPS+274% |
| Boost Clock | 1770 MHz+3% | 1725 MHz |
| ROPs | 48 | 96+100% |
| TMUs | 96 | 184+92% |
| L1 Cache | 1.5 MB | 5.8 MB+287% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3070 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 3070 has 8 GB. The GeForce RTX 3070 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3070) — a 55.6% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce RTX 3070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 288 GB/s | 448 GB/s+56% |
| Bus Width | 192-bit | 256-bit+33% |
| L2 Cache | 1.5 MB | 4 MB+167% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 3070). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4 | 1.4 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs NVENC 7th gen (GeForce RTX 3070). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs NVDEC 5th gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (GeForce RTX 3070).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th gen | NVENC 7th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 4th gen | NVDEC 5th gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti draws 120W versus the GeForce RTX 3070's 220W — a 58.8% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 3070). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 120W-45% | 220W |
| Recommended PSU | 450W-31% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 229mm | 242mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 106.2+5% | 100.8 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti launched at $279 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3070 launched at $499. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti costs 44.1% less ($220 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.7 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 44.4 (GeForce RTX 3070) — the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti offers 2.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 3070 is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2019).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1660 Ti | GeForce RTX 3070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $279-44% | $499 |
| Performance per Dollar | 45.7+3% | 44.4 |
| Codename | TU116 | GA104 |
| Release | February 22 2019 | September 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #204 | #63 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












