G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $320 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 200W, a 80W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 304mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,747 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅+111.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌
114.7% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
❌66.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 120W.
❌32.8% longer card at 304mm vs 229mm.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

2019

GeForce RTX 4070

2023

Why buy it

✅Costs $320 less on MSRP ($279 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
✅Draws 120W instead of 200W, a 80W reduction.
✅Measures 229mm instead of 304mm, a 75mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Why buy it

✅+111.2% higher PassMark G3D performance.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Lower PassMark G3D performance (12,747 vs 26,919).
❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: GeForce RTX 4070 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.

Trade-offs

❌
114.7% HIGHER MSRP
$599 MSRPvs$279 MSRP
❌66.7% higher power demand at 200W vs 120W.
❌32.8% longer card at 304mm vs 229mm.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 4070 better than GeForce GTX 1660 Ti?

Yes. GeForce RTX 4070 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 26,919 vs 12,747 in G3D Mark. On top of that, GeForce RTX 4070 is a 2023 card with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation, while GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is a 2019 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 4070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019, 111.2% more raw performance headroom, more VRAM at 12 GB instead of 6 GB, and better upscaling support with DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack and better frame-generation support with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That leaves it with more room for heavier textures, tougher ray tracing loads, and higher-end 1440p or 4K gaming over the next few years.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 4070 is about 114.7% more expensive on MSRP at $599 MSRP versus $279 MSRP, and you are getting 111.2% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, GeForce RTX 4070 is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, GeForce GTX 1660 Ti still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

Is GeForce GTX 1660 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $279 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, GeForce RTX 4070 earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Benchmark Check

GeForce RTX 4070 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	GeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low	98 FPS	183 FPS
medium	88 FPS	167 FPS
high	76 FPS	151 FPS
ultra	63 FPS	131 FPS
1440p
low	90 FPS	150 FPS
medium	77 FPS	124 FPS
high	66 FPS	110 FPS
ultra	54 FPS	101 FPS
4K
low	45 FPS	92 FPS
medium	41 FPS	78 FPS
high	30 FPS	65 FPS
ultra	26 FPS	58 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Open GeForce RTX 4070

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	GeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low	269 FPS	544 FPS
medium	227 FPS	454 FPS
high	170 FPS	353 FPS
ultra	136 FPS	299 FPS
1440p
low	183 FPS	351 FPS
medium	156 FPS	288 FPS
high	124 FPS	235 FPS
ultra	100 FPS	197 FPS
4K
low	106 FPS	172 FPS
medium	89 FPS	144 FPS
high	72 FPS	125 FPS
ultra	56 FPS	101 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Open GeForce RTX 4070

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	GeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low	574 FPS	884 FPS
medium	459 FPS	713 FPS
high	382 FPS	643 FPS
ultra	287 FPS	569 FPS
1440p
low	430 FPS	684 FPS
medium	344 FPS	549 FPS
high	287 FPS	483 FPS
ultra	215 FPS	424 FPS
4K
low	287 FPS	467 FPS
medium	229 FPS	373 FPS
high	191 FPS	326 FPS
ultra	143 FPS	277 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Open GeForce RTX 4070

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	GeForce RTX 4070
1080p
low	401 FPS	751 FPS
medium	326 FPS	612 FPS
high	263 FPS	536 FPS
ultra	221 FPS	497 FPS
1440p
low	330 FPS	615 FPS
medium	268 FPS	500 FPS
high	206 FPS	433 FPS
ultra	164 FPS	395 FPS
4K
low	158 FPS	384 FPS
medium	119 FPS	324 FPS
high	107 FPS	301 FPS
ultra	85 FPS	272 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1660 Ti Open GeForce RTX 4070

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1660 Ti and GeForce RTX 4070

GeForce GTX 1660 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 22 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1770 MHz. It has 1536 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 12,747 points. Launch price was $279.

GeForce RTX 4070

The GeForce RTX 4070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1920 MHz to 2475 MHz. It has 5888 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 46 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 26,919 points. Launch price was $599.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti scores 12,747 versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 26,919 — the GeForce RTX 4070 leads by 111.2%. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is built on Turing while the GeForce RTX 4070 uses Ada Lovelace, both on 12 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,536 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 5,888 (GeForce RTX 4070). Raw compute: 5.437 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 29.15 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4070). Boost clocks: 1770 MHz vs 2475 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	GeForce RTX 4070
G3D Mark Score	12,747	26,919+111%
Architecture	Turing	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	12 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	1536	5888+283%
Compute (TFLOPS)	5.437 TFLOPS	29.15 TFLOPS+436%
Boost Clock	1770 MHz	2475 MHz+40%
ROPs	48	64+33%
TMUs	96	184+92%
L1 Cache	1.5 MB	5.8 MB+287%
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	36 MB+2300%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070 is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4070 supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	GeForce RTX 4070
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation
Ray Reconstruction	No	Yes (DLSS 3.5)
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 4070 has 12 GB. The GeForce RTX 4070 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 288 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 504 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4070) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce RTX 4070. Bus width: 192-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 1.5 MB (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 36 MB (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce RTX 4070 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	GeForce RTX 4070
VRAM Capacity	6 GB	12 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6X
Memory Bandwidth	288 GB/s	504 GB/s+75%
Bus Width	192-bit	192-bit
L2 Cache	1.5 MB	36 MB+2300%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4070). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	GeForce RTX 4070
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.4+8%	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th gen (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (2x) (GeForce RTX 4070). Decoder: NVDEC 4th gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4070).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	GeForce RTX 4070
Encoder	NVENC 7th gen	8th Gen NVENC (2x)
Decoder	NVDEC 4th gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti draws 120W versus the GeForce RTX 4070's 200W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 450W (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 650W (GeForce RTX 4070). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 229mm vs 304mm, occupying 2 vs 3 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1660 Ti	GeForce RTX 4070
TDP	120W-40%	200W
Recommended PSU	450W-31%	650W
Power Connector	8-pin	8-pin
Length	229mm	304mm
Height	111mm	137mm
Slots	2-33%	3
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	106.2	134.6+27%

💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti launched at $279 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4070 launched at $599. The GeForce GTX 1660 Ti costs 53.4% less ($320 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 45.7 (GeForce GTX 1660 Ti) vs 44.9 (GeForce RTX 4070) — the GeForce GTX 1660 Ti offers 1.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 4070 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).