G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 61.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
❌81.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 165W.
❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.

Radeon RX 7600

2023

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 165W instead of 300W, a 135W reduction.
✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

2018

Radeon RX 7600

2023

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 61.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 165W instead of 300W, a 135W reduction.
✅Measures 240mm instead of 267mm, a 27mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 61.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
❌81.8% higher power demand at 300W vs 165W.
❌11.3% longer card at 267mm vs 240mm.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 7600 better than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU?

Yes. Radeon RX 7600 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 16,581 vs 15,633 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX 7600 is a 2023 card with FSR 3 + AFMF, while Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is a 2018 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 7600 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2018, better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 6nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 7600 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $269 MSRP. Radeon RX 7600 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon RX 7600 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $269 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 6.1% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $269 MSRP gets you newer hardware, lower power draw (165W vs 300W), and FSR 3 + AFMF.

Is Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below an unclear MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Radeon RX 7600 is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and FSR 3 + AFMF.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 7600 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon RX 7600
1080p
low	211 FPS	168 FPS
medium	191 FPS	149 FPS
high	160 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	183 FPS	140 FPS
medium	158 FPS	114 FPS
high	115 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	75 FPS	91 FPS
4K
low	76 FPS	85 FPS
medium	66 FPS	72 FPS
high	47 FPS	59 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	52 FPS

Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Open Radeon RX 7600

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon RX 7600
1080p
low	320 FPS	414 FPS
medium	269 FPS	349 FPS
high	212 FPS	267 FPS
ultra	168 FPS	206 FPS
1440p
low	212 FPS	241 FPS
medium	176 FPS	205 FPS
high	150 FPS	163 FPS
ultra	115 FPS	130 FPS
4K
low	100 FPS	109 FPS
medium	81 FPS	91 FPS
high	68 FPS	75 FPS
ultra	51 FPS	57 FPS

Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Open Radeon RX 7600

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon RX 7600
1080p
low	703 FPS	746 FPS
medium	563 FPS	597 FPS
high	469 FPS	497 FPS
ultra	352 FPS	373 FPS
1440p
low	528 FPS	560 FPS
medium	422 FPS	448 FPS
high	352 FPS	373 FPS
ultra	264 FPS	280 FPS
4K
low	352 FPS	373 FPS
medium	281 FPS	298 FPS
high	234 FPS	249 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	187 FPS

Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Open Radeon RX 7600

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon RX 7600
1080p
low	321 FPS	604 FPS
medium	279 FPS	517 FPS
high	243 FPS	443 FPS
ultra	183 FPS	352 FPS
1440p
low	237 FPS	468 FPS
medium	212 FPS	397 FPS
high	185 FPS	322 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	259 FPS
4K
low	142 FPS	293 FPS
medium	125 FPS	271 FPS
high	101 FPS	235 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	187 FPS

Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Open Radeon RX 7600

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU and Radeon RX 7600

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.

Radeon RX 7600

The Radeon RX 7600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 24 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1720 MHz to 2655 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,581 points. Launch price was $269.

⚡

Graphics Performance

In G3D Mark, the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU scores 15,633 versus the Radeon RX 7600's 16,581 — the Radeon RX 7600 leads by 6.1%. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon RX 7600 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 21.75 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 2655 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon RX 7600
G3D Mark Score	15,633	16,581+6%
Architecture	GCN 5.0	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	14 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	3584 ×2+75%	2048
Compute (TFLOPS)	10.75 TFLOPS ×2	21.75 TFLOPS+102%
Boost Clock	1500 MHz	2655 MHz+77%
ROPs	64 ×2	64
TMUs	224 ×2+75%	128
L1 Cache	896 KB+75%	512 KB
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR 3 + AFMF

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600 is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon RX 7600
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600) — the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon RX 7600
VRAM Capacity	32 GB+300%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon RX 7600
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	0	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7600).

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon RX 7600
Encoder	VCN 3.0	VCN 4.0
Decoder	VCN 3.0	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU draws 300W versus the Radeon RX 7600's 165W — a 58.1% difference. The Radeon RX 7600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 550W (Radeon RX 7600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 240mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon RX 7600
TDP	300W	165W-45%
Recommended PSU	650W	550W-15%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	8-pin
Length	267mm	240mm
Height	111mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	75°C	75°C
Perf/Watt	52.1	100.5+93%