Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU vs Radeon Pro Vega II

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs Unknown).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega II: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega II is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 300W instead of 475W, a 175W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).

Radeon Pro Vega II

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: GCN 5.1 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌58.3% higher power demand at 475W vs 300W.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

2018

Radeon Pro Vega II

2019

Why buy it

✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs Unknown).
✅Less risky long-term buy than Radeon Pro Vega II: it remains the more sensible modern option while Radeon Pro Vega II is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
✅Draws 300W instead of 475W, a 175W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 7.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($2,199 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅More future proof: GCN 5.1 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 7.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $2,199 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌58.3% higher power demand at 475W vs 300W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU better than Radeon Pro Vega II?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 15,633 vs 15,597 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is the overall package: you are getting FSR upscaling, plus much lower power draw (300W vs 475W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting more VRAM at 32 GB instead of Unknown. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $2,199 MSRP, and you are getting 0.2% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro Vega II really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

When does Radeon Pro Vega II make more sense than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU?

Yes. Radeon Pro Vega II is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture and staying closer to $2,199 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU currently gives you 0.2% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro Vega II still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro Vega II Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon Pro Vega II
1080p
low	211 FPS	145 FPS
medium	191 FPS	135 FPS
high	160 FPS	115 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	88 FPS
1440p
low	183 FPS	128 FPS
medium	158 FPS	109 FPS
high	115 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	75 FPS	73 FPS
4K
low	76 FPS	60 FPS
medium	66 FPS	53 FPS
high	47 FPS	44 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	39 FPS

Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Open Radeon Pro Vega II

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon Pro Vega II
1080p
low	301 FPS	414 FPS
medium	255 FPS	348 FPS
high	201 FPS	275 FPS
ultra	158 FPS	225 FPS
1440p
low	203 FPS	258 FPS
medium	172 FPS	219 FPS
high	146 FPS	181 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	147 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	120 FPS
medium	82 FPS	99 FPS
high	69 FPS	81 FPS
ultra	52 FPS	64 FPS

Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Open Radeon Pro Vega II

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon Pro Vega II
1080p
low	703 FPS	687 FPS
medium	563 FPS	561 FPS
high	469 FPS	468 FPS
ultra	352 FPS	351 FPS
1440p
low	528 FPS	520 FPS
medium	422 FPS	421 FPS
high	352 FPS	351 FPS
ultra	264 FPS	263 FPS
4K
low	352 FPS	315 FPS
medium	281 FPS	270 FPS
high	234 FPS	220 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	174 FPS

Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Open Radeon Pro Vega II

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon Pro Vega II
1080p
low	321 FPS	422 FPS
medium	279 FPS	353 FPS
high	243 FPS	307 FPS
ultra	183 FPS	262 FPS
1440p
low	237 FPS	313 FPS
medium	212 FPS	265 FPS
high	185 FPS	221 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	190 FPS
4K
low	142 FPS	185 FPS
medium	125 FPS	166 FPS
high	101 FPS	142 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	117 FPS

Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Open Radeon Pro Vega II

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU and Radeon Pro Vega II

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.

Radeon Pro Vega II

The Radeon Pro Vega II is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 3 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1574 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 475W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,597 points. Launch price was $2,199.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU scores 15,633 and the Radeon Pro Vega II reaches 15,597 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon Pro Vega II uses GCN 5.1, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 14.09 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro Vega II). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1720 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon Pro Vega II
G3D Mark Score	15,633	15,597
Architecture	GCN 5.0	GCN 5.1
Process Node	14 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	3584 ×2	4096+14%
Compute (TFLOPS)	10.75 TFLOPS ×2	14.09 TFLOPS+31%
Boost Clock	1500 MHz	1720 MHz+15%
ROPs	64 ×2	64
TMUs	224 ×2	256+14%
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	1 MB+14%
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR upscaling

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon Pro Vega II
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega II has 0 MB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon Pro Vega II
VRAM Capacity	32 GB	Shared System RAM
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	384-bit+200%
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon Pro Vega II
DirectX	12.2	12.1
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	0	6

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega II).

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon Pro Vega II
Encoder	VCN 3.0	VCE 4.1
Decoder	VCN 3.0	UVD 7.2
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU draws 300W versus the Radeon Pro Vega II's 475W — a 45.2% difference. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega II). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon Pro Vega II
TDP	300W-37%	475W
Recommended PSU	650W	1W-100%
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Integrated
Length	267mm	267mm
Height	111mm	120mm
Slots	2-50%	4
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	52.1+59%	32.8