
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 8060S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅144.5% more average FPS across 31 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 32.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌445.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 55W.
Radeon RX 8060S
2025Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 on Unknown node with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 300W, a 245W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU across 31 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
2018Radeon RX 8060S
2025Why buy it
- ✅144.5% more average FPS across 31 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 32.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.5 on Unknown node with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 55W instead of 300W, a 245W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 32.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ❌445.5% higher power demand at 300W vs 55W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU across 31 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 8060S better than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 8060S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 166 FPS | 69 FPS |
| medium | 148 FPS | 60 FPS |
| high | 124 FPS | 44 FPS |
| ultra | 90 FPS | 31 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 56 FPS |
| medium | 124 FPS | 49 FPS |
| high | 91 FPS | 33 FPS |
| ultra | 65 FPS | 22 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 69 FPS | 24 FPS |
| medium | 60 FPS | 22 FPS |
| high | 42 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 12 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 8060S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 82 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 37 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 27 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 26 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 21 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 15 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 8060S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 703 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 563 FPS | 224 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 528 FPS | 202 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 45 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 8060S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 259 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 224 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 190 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 197 FPS | 93 FPS |
| medium | 175 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 149 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 118 FPS | 45 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 121 FPS | 58 FPS |
| medium | 105 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 34 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 26 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU and Radeon RX 8060S

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.

Radeon RX 8060S
Radeon RX 8060S
The Radeon RX 8060S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 6 2025. It features the RDNA 3.5 architecture. The boost clock speed is 2900 MHz. It has 40 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 55W. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,000 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU scores 15,633 and the Radeon RX 8060S reaches 16,000 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon RX 8060S uses RDNA 3.5. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 40 (Radeon RX 8060S). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 2900 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 8060S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,633 | 16,000+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | RDNA 3.5 |
| Shading Units | 3584 ×2+8860% | 40 |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 2900 MHz+93% |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 8060S is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 8060S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 8060S has 0 MB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs System Shared.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 8060S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB | none |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | LPDDR5X (Shared) |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | System Shared |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 8060S). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 8060S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs VCN 4.5 (Radeon RX 8060S). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs VCN 4.5. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 8060S).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 8060S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 4.5 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 4.5 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU draws 300W versus the Radeon RX 8060S's 55W — a 138% difference. The Radeon RX 8060S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 650W (Radeon RX 8060S). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 8060S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 55W-82% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 52.1 | 290.9+458% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 8060S is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 8060S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $500 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | — |
| Release | August 26 2018 | January 6 2025 |
| Ranking | #592 | #117 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













