
GeForce GTX 1080
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1080
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 300W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1080: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1080 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 180W.
GeForce GTX 1080
2016Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.1 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 300W, a 120W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Less risky long-term buy than GeForce GTX 1080: it remains the more sensible modern option while GeForce GTX 1080 is already legacy-tier future-proofing.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 14nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.1 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 180W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU better than GeForce GTX 1080?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1080 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 211 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 183 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 158 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 289 FPS | 301 FPS |
| medium | 242 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 201 FPS |
| ultra | 147 FPS | 158 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 203 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 172 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 146 FPS |
| ultra | 103 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 106 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 88 FPS | 82 FPS |
| high | 73 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 52 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 702 FPS | 703 FPS |
| medium | 562 FPS | 563 FPS |
| high | 468 FPS | 469 FPS |
| ultra | 351 FPS | 352 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 527 FPS | 528 FPS |
| medium | 421 FPS | 422 FPS |
| high | 351 FPS | 352 FPS |
| ultra | 263 FPS | 264 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 351 FPS | 352 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 281 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 176 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 399 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 334 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 281 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 241 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 237 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 137 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 180 FPS | 142 FPS |
| medium | 141 FPS | 125 FPS |
| high | 129 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 78 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1080 and Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

GeForce GTX 1080
GeForce GTX 1080
The GeForce GTX 1080 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in May 27 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1733 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,609 points. Launch price was $599.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1080 scores 15,609 and the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU reaches 15,633 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1080 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 16 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,560 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Raw compute: 8.873 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1733 MHz vs 1500 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,609 | 15,633 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2560 | 3584 ×2+40% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.873 TFLOPS | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2+21% |
| Boost Clock | 1733 MHz+16% | 1500 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 160 | 224 ×2+40% |
| L1 Cache | 960 KB+7% | 896 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1080 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1080 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has 32 GB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) — the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 32 GB+300% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5X | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 0 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1080) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1080) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1080 draws 180W versus the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU's 300W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1080 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1080) vs 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W-40% | 300W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-23% | 650W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 86.7+66% | 52.1 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is the newer GPU (2018 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1080 | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | Vega 10 |
| Release | May 27 2016 | August 26 2018 |
| Ranking | #137 | #592 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













