GeForce RTX 2070 vs Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce RTX 2070

2018

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Draws 175W instead of 300W, a 125W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
❌71.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 175W.

GeForce RTX 2070

2018

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 26.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅Draws 175W instead of 300W, a 125W reduction.

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.

Trade-offs

❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 26.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
❌71.4% higher power demand at 300W vs 175W.

Quick Answers

So, is GeForce RTX 2070 better than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU?

Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 16,068 vs 15,633 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer GeForce RTX 2070 is the overall package: you are getting DLSS Super Resolution, plus much lower power draw (175W vs 300W).

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

GeForce RTX 2070 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling and a 12nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

GeForce RTX 2070 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $599 MSRP. GeForce RTX 2070 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. GeForce RTX 2070 is priced in an unclear MSRP range at $599 MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 2.8% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $599 MSRP gets you lower power draw (175W vs 300W), and DLSS Super Resolution.

Is Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below an unclear MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. GeForce RTX 2070 is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with DLSS Super Resolution.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce RTX 2070 Benchmark Check

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2070	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	152 FPS	166 FPS
medium	134 FPS	148 FPS
high	117 FPS	124 FPS
ultra	98 FPS	90 FPS
1440p
low	131 FPS	146 FPS
medium	107 FPS	124 FPS
high	91 FPS	91 FPS
ultra	81 FPS	65 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	69 FPS
medium	63 FPS	60 FPS
high	48 FPS	42 FPS
ultra	42 FPS	37 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2070 Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce RTX 2070	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	321 FPS	301 FPS
medium	269 FPS	255 FPS
high	219 FPS	201 FPS
ultra	184 FPS	158 FPS
1440p
low	218 FPS	203 FPS
medium	182 FPS	172 FPS
high	150 FPS	146 FPS
ultra	122 FPS	112 FPS
4K
low	123 FPS	99 FPS
medium	105 FPS	82 FPS
high	85 FPS	69 FPS
ultra	64 FPS	52 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2070 Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce RTX 2070	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	723 FPS	703 FPS
medium	578 FPS	563 FPS
high	482 FPS	469 FPS
ultra	362 FPS	352 FPS
1440p
low	542 FPS	528 FPS
medium	434 FPS	422 FPS
high	362 FPS	352 FPS
ultra	271 FPS	264 FPS
4K
low	362 FPS	352 FPS
medium	289 FPS	281 FPS
high	241 FPS	234 FPS
ultra	181 FPS	176 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2070 Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce RTX 2070	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
1080p
low	434 FPS	259 FPS
medium	367 FPS	224 FPS
high	297 FPS	190 FPS
ultra	257 FPS	153 FPS
1440p
low	361 FPS	197 FPS
medium	309 FPS	175 FPS
high	239 FPS	149 FPS
ultra	199 FPS	118 FPS
4K
low	206 FPS	121 FPS
medium	170 FPS	105 FPS
high	158 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	124 FPS	67 FPS

Open GeForce RTX 2070 Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2070 and Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

GeForce RTX 2070

The GeForce RTX 2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 17 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,068 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce RTX 2070 scores 16,068 and the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU reaches 15,633 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2070 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU uses GCN 5.0, both on 12 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Raw compute: 7.465 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Boost clocks: 1620 MHz vs 1500 MHz.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
G3D Mark Score	16,068+3%	15,633
Architecture	Turing	GCN 5.0
Process Node	12 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	2304	3584 ×2+56%
Compute (TFLOPS)	7.465 TFLOPS	10.75 TFLOPS ×2+44%
Boost Clock	1620 MHz+8%	1500 MHz
ROPs	64	64 ×2
TMUs	144	224 ×2+56%
L1 Cache	2.3 MB+161%	0.88 MB
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce RTX 2070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Upscaling Tech	DLSS 2 Super Resolution	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce RTX 2070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has 32 GB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	32 GB+300%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 0.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
DirectX	12.1	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	0

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU).

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Encoder	NVENC 6.0	VCN 3.0
Decoder	PureVideo HD VP9	VCN 3.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce RTX 2070 draws 175W versus the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU's 300W — a 52.6% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.

Feature	GeForce RTX 2070	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
TDP	175W-42%	300W
Recommended PSU	550W-15%	650W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	267mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	80°C	75°C-6%
Perf/Watt	91.8+76%	52.1