
GeForce RTX 2070
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5700 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2070
2018Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 175W instead of 225W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌33.4% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 36.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Radeon RX 5700 XT
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.0 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 175W.
GeForce RTX 2070
2018Radeon RX 5700 XT
2019Why buy it
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 175W instead of 225W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($449 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 34.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.0 vs 26.8 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $599 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 8 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌33.4% HIGHER MSRP$599 MSRPvs$449 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 26.8 vs 36.0 G3D/$ ($599 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌28.6% higher power demand at 225W vs 175W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5700 XT better than GeForce RTX 2070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce RTX 2070 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 193 FPS | 196 FPS |
| medium | 174 FPS | 178 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 113 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 164 FPS | 166 FPS |
| medium | 134 FPS | 135 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 91 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 81 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 68 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 327 FPS | 311 FPS |
| medium | 272 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 221 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 187 FPS | 134 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 218 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 177 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 120 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 100 FPS | 72 FPS |
| high | 79 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 723 FPS | 728 FPS |
| medium | 578 FPS | 583 FPS |
| high | 482 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 362 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 542 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 434 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 362 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 271 FPS | 273 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 362 FPS | 364 FPS |
| medium | 289 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 241 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 181 FPS | 182 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 472 FPS | 580 FPS |
| medium | 401 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 320 FPS | 421 FPS |
| ultra | 275 FPS | 347 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 385 FPS | 467 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 404 FPS |
| high | 254 FPS | 323 FPS |
| ultra | 209 FPS | 264 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 220 FPS | 283 FPS |
| medium | 182 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 168 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 131 FPS | 182 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2070 and Radeon RX 5700 XT

GeForce RTX 2070
GeForce RTX 2070
The GeForce RTX 2070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 17 2018. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1620 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 175W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,068 points. Launch price was $499.

Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT
The Radeon RX 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1605 MHz to 1905 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,183 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2070 scores 16,068 and the Radeon RX 5700 XT reaches 16,183 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2070 is built on Turing while the Radeon RX 5700 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 5700 XT). Raw compute: 7.465 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 9.754 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700 XT). Boost clocks: 1620 MHz vs 1905 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 16,068 | 16,183 |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 7.465 TFLOPS | 9.754 TFLOPS+31% |
| Boost Clock | 1620 MHz | 1905 MHz+18% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 160+11% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5700 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce RTX 2070 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 2070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon RX 5700 XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 448 GB/s | 448 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 12 (Radeon RX 5700 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6.0 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs VCE (Radeon RX 5700 XT). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP9 vs UVD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 5700 XT).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6.0 | VCE |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP9 | UVD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2070 draws 175W versus the Radeon RX 5700 XT's 225W — a 25% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 550W (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 600W (Radeon RX 5700 XT). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 272mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 80°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 175W-22% | 225W |
| Recommended PSU | 550W-8% | 600W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 272mm |
| Height | 112mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 80°C | 75°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 91.8+28% | 71.9 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2070 launched at $599 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5700 XT launched at $449. The Radeon RX 5700 XT costs 25% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 26.8 (GeForce RTX 2070) vs 36.0 (Radeon RX 5700 XT) — the Radeon RX 5700 XT offers 34.3% better value. The Radeon RX 5700 XT is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2070 | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $599 | $449-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 26.8 | 36.0+34% |
| Codename | TU106 | Navi 10 |
| Release | October 17 2018 | July 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #129 | #128 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













