
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 6800S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 19.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 300W vs 100W.
Radeon RX 6800S
2022Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 300W, a 200W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
2018Radeon RX 6800S
2022Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 19.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($800 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 300W, a 200W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 19.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $800 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 300W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 6800S better than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 6800S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 207 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 164 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 126 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 174 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 142 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 124 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 90 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 76 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 61 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 53 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 6800S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 191 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 153 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 184 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 150 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 119 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 100 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 81 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 51 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 6800S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 703 FPS | 713 FPS |
| medium | 563 FPS | 570 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 475 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 356 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 528 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 428 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 356 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 267 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 356 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 285 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 238 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 178 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 6800S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 395 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 275 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 384 FPS |
| medium | 212 FPS | 324 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 251 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 205 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 221 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 168 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 130 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU and Radeon RX 6800S

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.

Radeon RX 6800S
Radeon RX 6800S
The Radeon RX 6800S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1800 MHz to 2100 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,841 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU scores 15,633 and the Radeon RX 6800S reaches 15,841 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon RX 6800S uses RDNA 2.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 6800S). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 8.602 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6800S). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 2100 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 6800S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,633 | 15,841+1% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 ×2+75% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2+25% | 8.602 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 2100 MHz+40% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 64 |
| TMUs | 224 ×2+75% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+75% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6800S is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 6800S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 6800S has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6800S) — the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 6800S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 12 (12_2) (Radeon RX 6800S). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 6800S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs RDNA 2 Media Engine (Radeon RX 6800S). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs RDNA 2 Media Engine. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6800S).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 6800S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | RDNA 2 Media Engine |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | RDNA 2 Media Engine |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU draws 300W versus the Radeon RX 6800S's 100W — a 100% difference. The Radeon RX 6800S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 650W (Radeon RX 6800S). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 6800S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 100W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 52.1 | 158.4+204% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 6800S is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 6800S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $800 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Navi 23 |
| Release | August 26 2018 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #592 | #135 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













