
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7800M
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 180W.
Radeon RX 7800M
2024Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 300W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
2018Radeon RX 7800M
2024Why buy it
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 12 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 180W instead of 300W, a 120W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 300W vs 180W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 12 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7800M better than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 196 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 133 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 180 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 452 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 384 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 313 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 276 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 344 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 286 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 230 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 191 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 169 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 141 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 116 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 92 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 703 FPS | 719 FPS |
| medium | 563 FPS | 575 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 360 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 528 FPS | 539 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 180 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 687 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 575 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 480 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 360 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 212 FPS | 432 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 270 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 360 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 288 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 180 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU and Radeon RX 7800M

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.

Radeon RX 7800M
Radeon RX 7800M
The Radeon RX 7800M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in September 11 2024. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1295 MHz to 2335 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 60 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,984 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU scores 15,633 and the Radeon RX 7800M reaches 15,984 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon RX 7800M uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 3,840 (Radeon RX 7800M). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 35.87 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7800M). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 2335 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,633 | 15,984+2% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 ×2 | 3840+7% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 | 35.87 TFLOPS+234% |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 2335 MHz+56% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 224 ×2 | 240+7% |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+17% | 768 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7800M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7800M has 12 GB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 192-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+167% | 12 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 192-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 12.2 (Radeon RX 7800M). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7800M). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 7800M).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU draws 300W versus the Radeon RX 7800M's 180W — a 50% difference. The Radeon RX 7800M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 650W (Radeon RX 7800M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 7800M |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 180W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 52.1 | 88.8+70% |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













