
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5700 XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 36.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 225W.
Radeon RX 5700 XT
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 300W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
2018Radeon RX 5700 XT
2019Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 225W instead of 300W, a 75W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 36.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 300W vs 225W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5700 XT better than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 105 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 134 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 95 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 81 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 49 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 320 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 269 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 168 FPS | 129 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 212 FPS | 176 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 147 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 115 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 100 FPS | 88 FPS |
| medium | 81 FPS | 74 FPS |
| high | 68 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 51 FPS | 44 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 703 FPS | 728 FPS |
| medium | 563 FPS | 583 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 485 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 364 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 528 FPS | 546 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 437 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 364 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 273 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 364 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 291 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 182 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 535 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 456 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 391 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 324 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 439 FPS |
| medium | 212 FPS | 376 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 304 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 250 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 265 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 182 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU and Radeon RX 5700 XT

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.

Radeon RX 5700 XT
Radeon RX 5700 XT
The Radeon RX 5700 XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1605 MHz to 1905 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 225W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 16,183 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU scores 15,633 and the Radeon RX 5700 XT reaches 16,183 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon RX 5700 XT uses RDNA 1.0, both on 14 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 2,560 (Radeon RX 5700 XT). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 9.754 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700 XT). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 1905 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,633 | 16,183+4% |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 ×2+40% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2+10% | 9.754 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 1905 MHz+27% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 64 |
| TMUs | 224 ×2+40% | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5700 XT is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 5700 XT has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 12 (Radeon RX 5700 XT). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+8% | 1.2 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs VCE (Radeon RX 5700 XT). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs UVD. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC (Radeon RX 5700 XT).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | VCE |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | UVD |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU draws 300W versus the Radeon RX 5700 XT's 225W — a 28.6% difference. The Radeon RX 5700 XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 600W (Radeon RX 5700 XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 272mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 225W-25% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 600W-8% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 272mm |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 52.1 | 71.9+38% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 5700 XT is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 5700 XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $449 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Navi 10 |
| Release | August 26 2018 | July 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #592 | #128 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













