G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌160.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 115W.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

2023

Why buy it

✅21.3% more average FPS across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 115W instead of 300W, a 185W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

2018

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

2023

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).

Why buy it

✅21.3% more average FPS across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 115W instead of 300W, a 185W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌160.9% higher power demand at 300W vs 115W.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

So, is RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU better than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU?

Yes. RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is clearly the better overall GPU here. RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU averages 21.3% more FPS across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 15,848 vs 15,633 in G3D Mark. On top of that, RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is a 2023 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is a 2018 model from an older generation with FSR upscaling. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2018, the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling, and a 5nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus an unclear MSRP, and you are getting 21.3% more estimated average FPS across 30 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.4% higher G3D Mark. G3D-per-dollar is basically tied between them. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU still makes more sense on price alone, but the performance trade-off is much harder to justify by current standards.

Is Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to an unclear MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Benchmark Check

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
1080p
low	166 FPS	167 FPS
medium	148 FPS	153 FPS
high	124 FPS	132 FPS
ultra	90 FPS	116 FPS
1440p
low	146 FPS	139 FPS
medium	124 FPS	116 FPS
high	91 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	65 FPS	90 FPS
4K
low	69 FPS	90 FPS
medium	60 FPS	76 FPS
high	42 FPS	60 FPS
ultra	37 FPS	54 FPS

Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Open RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
1080p
low	301 FPS	393 FPS
medium	255 FPS	339 FPS
high	201 FPS	275 FPS
ultra	158 FPS	227 FPS
1440p
low	203 FPS	259 FPS
medium	172 FPS	214 FPS
high	146 FPS	181 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	148 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	123 FPS
medium	82 FPS	106 FPS
high	69 FPS	89 FPS
ultra	52 FPS	68 FPS

Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Open RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
1080p
low	703 FPS	713 FPS
medium	563 FPS	571 FPS
high	469 FPS	475 FPS
ultra	352 FPS	357 FPS
1440p
low	528 FPS	535 FPS
medium	422 FPS	428 FPS
high	352 FPS	357 FPS
ultra	264 FPS	267 FPS
4K
low	352 FPS	357 FPS
medium	281 FPS	285 FPS
high	234 FPS	238 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	178 FPS

Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Open RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
1080p
low	259 FPS	644 FPS
medium	224 FPS	552 FPS
high	190 FPS	475 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	357 FPS
1440p
low	197 FPS	535 FPS
medium	175 FPS	428 FPS
high	149 FPS	357 FPS
ultra	118 FPS	267 FPS
4K
low	121 FPS	330 FPS
medium	105 FPS	285 FPS
high	83 FPS	238 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	178 FPS

Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Open RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1395 MHz to 2000 MHz. It has 4608 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 36 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,848 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU scores 15,633 and the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU reaches 15,848 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 14 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 4,608 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 15.62 TFLOPS (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 2000 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
G3D Mark Score	15,633	15,848+1%
Architecture	GCN 5.0	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	14 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	3584 ×2	4608+29%
Compute (TFLOPS)	10.75 TFLOPS ×2	15.62 TFLOPS+45%
Boost Clock	1500 MHz	2000 MHz+33%
ROPs	64 ×2+33%	48
TMUs	224 ×2+56%	144
L1 Cache	0.88 MB	4.5 MB+411%
L2 Cache	4 MB	32 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 32 MB (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
VRAM Capacity	32 GB+300%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB	32 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 12.2 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
DirectX	12.2	12.2
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	0	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Encoder	VCN 3.0	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	VCN 3.0	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU draws 300W versus the RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 115W — a 89.2% difference. The RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 650W (RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	RTX 3000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
TDP	300W	115W-62%
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75°C-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	52.1	137.8+164%