
GeForce GTX 1070
Popular choices:

RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1070
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 150W vs 35W.
RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅50.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 150W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 35.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1070
2016RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅50.4% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 35W instead of 150W, a 115W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌328.6% higher power demand at 150W vs 35W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 35.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU better than GeForce GTX 1070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1070 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 135 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 49 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 49 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 44 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 530 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 439 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 344 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 297 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 436 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 362 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 294 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 258 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 221 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 152 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 608 FPS | 608 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 304 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 304 FPS | 304 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 304 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 152 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 395 FPS | 367 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 322 FPS |
| high | 278 FPS | 282 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 245 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 328 FPS | 278 FPS |
| medium | 275 FPS | 250 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 215 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 183 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 99 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 and RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070
The GeForce GTX 1070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,507 points. Launch price was $379.

RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 9 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1155 MHz to 2025 MHz. It has 12800 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 35W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 100 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,508 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1070 scores 13,507 and the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU reaches 13,508 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 is built on Pascal while the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 12,800 (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 6.463 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 65.28 TFLOPS (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 2025 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,507 | 13,508 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 12800+567% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.463 TFLOPS | 65.28 TFLOPS+910% |
| Boost Clock | 1683 MHz | 2025 MHz+20% |
| ROPs | 64 | 176+175% |
| TMUs | 120 | 400+233% |
| L1 Cache | 0.7 MB | 12.5 MB+1686% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 72 MB+3500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1070 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 72 MB (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 72 MB+3500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1070) vs NVENC 8th Gen (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs NVDEC 5th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | NVENC 8th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | NVDEC 5th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265 (HEVC),AV1,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 draws 150W versus the RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 35W — a 124.3% difference. The RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 500W (RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 35W-77% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 90.0 | 385.9+329% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX 1000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | AD102 |
| Release | June 10 2016 | August 9 2023 |
| Ranking | #185 | #16 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













