
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 1070
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌71.2% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.1 vs 35.6 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1070
2016Why buy it
- ✅9.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 68.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.6 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015GeForce GTX 1070
2016Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅9.1% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $270 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 68.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.6 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌71.2% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 21.1 vs 35.6 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1070 better than GeForce GTX 980 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 980 Ti make more sense than GeForce GTX 1070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 111 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 93 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 123 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 89 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 78 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 65 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 39 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 33 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 210 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 176 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 110 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 106 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 61 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 51 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 41 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 608 FPS |
| medium | 494 FPS | 486 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 405 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 304 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 463 FPS | 456 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 304 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 228 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 304 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 243 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 203 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 152 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 232 FPS | 395 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 332 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 278 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 328 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 275 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 178 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 139 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 127 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 104 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980 Ti and GeForce GTX 1070

GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 2 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,711 points. Launch price was $649.

GeForce GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070
The GeForce GTX 1070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,507 points. Launch price was $379.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti scores 13,711 and the GeForce GTX 1070 reaches 13,507 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the GeForce GTX 1070 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 1,920 (GeForce GTX 1070). Raw compute: 6.06 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 6.463 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1683 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,711+2% | 13,507 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816+47% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.06 TFLOPS | 6.463 TFLOPS+7% |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 1683 MHz+57% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 176+47% | 120 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+43% | 0.7 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 1070 has 8 GB. The GeForce GTX 1070 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1070) — a 31.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 980 Ti. Bus width: 384-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070) — the GeForce GTX 980 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s+31% | 256 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+50% | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB+50% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1070). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC 3rd gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1070).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3.0 | NVENC 6th gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | NVDEC 3rd gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti draws 250W versus the GeForce GTX 1070's 150W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 500W (GeForce GTX 1070). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 150W-40% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 54.8 | 90.0+64% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti launched at $649 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 1070 launched at $379. The GeForce GTX 1070 costs 41.6% less ($270 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 35.6 (GeForce GTX 1070) — the GeForce GTX 1070 offers 68.7% better value. The GeForce GTX 1070 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | GeForce GTX 1070 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649 | $379-42% |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.1 | 35.6+69% |
| Codename | GM200 | GP104 |
| Release | June 2 2015 | June 10 2016 |
| Ranking | #179 | #185 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













