
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Popular choices:

Titan X Pascal
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $550 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 85.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Titan X Pascal across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Titan X Pascal
2016Why buy it
- ✅30.6% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌84.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,199 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015Titan X Pascal
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $550 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 85.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅30.6% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Titan X Pascal across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌84.7% HIGHER MSRP$1,199 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Titan X Pascal better than GeForce GTX 980 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 980 Ti make more sense than Titan X Pascal?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 296 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 494 FPS | 492 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 410 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 307 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 463 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 307 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 231 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 154 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 232 FPS | 519 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 307 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 299 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 231 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 154 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980 Ti and Titan X Pascal

GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 2 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,711 points. Launch price was $649.

Titan X Pascal
Titan X Pascal
The Titan X Pascal is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 2 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1417 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,660 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti scores 13,711 and the Titan X Pascal reaches 13,660 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Titan X Pascal uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 3,584 (Titan X Pascal). Raw compute: 6.06 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 10.97 TFLOPS (Titan X Pascal). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1531 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,711 | 13,660 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816 | 3584+27% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.06 TFLOPS | 10.97 TFLOPS+81% |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 1531 MHz+42% |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 176 | 224+27% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 1.3 MB+30% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Titan X Pascal relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Titan X Pascal has 8 GB. The Titan X Pascal offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 480 GB/s (Titan X Pascal) — a 42.9% advantage for the Titan X Pascal. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 480 GB/s+43% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 384-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 12.1 (Titan X Pascal). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Titan X Pascal). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Titan X Pascal).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3.0 | NVENC 5.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti draws 250W versus the Titan X Pascal's 250W — a 0% difference. The Titan X Pascal is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 600W (Titan X Pascal). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 600W |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 54.8 | 54.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti launched at $649 MSRP, while the Titan X Pascal launched at $1199. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti costs 45.9% less ($550 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 11.4 (Titan X Pascal) — the GeForce GTX 980 Ti offers 85.1% better value. The Titan X Pascal is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649-46% | $1199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.1+85% | 11.4 |
| Codename | GM200 | GP102 |
| Release | June 2 2015 | August 2 2016 |
| Ranking | #179 | #198 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













