GeForce GTX 980 Ti vs Titan X Pascal

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

2015Core: 1000 MHzBoost: 1075 MHz

Popular choices:

VS

Titan X Pascal

2016Core: 1417 MHzBoost: 1531 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

2015

Why buy it

  • Costs $550 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
  • Delivers 85.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).

Trade-offs

  • Lower average FPS than Titan X Pascal across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.

Titan X Pascal

2016

Why buy it

  • 30.6% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
  • 33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
  • More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
  • 84.7% HIGHER MSRP
    $1,199 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Titan X Pascal better than GeForce GTX 980 Ti?
Yes. Titan X Pascal is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 30.6% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data, 0.4% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 8 GB vs 6 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2016 instead of 2015, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
GeForce GTX 980 Ti is the safer long-term GPU choice because it gives you the stronger overall hardware and feature outlook for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Titan X Pascal is the smarter buy by a wide margin. Titan X Pascal is about 84.7% more expensive on MSRP at $1,199 MSRP versus $649 MSRP, and you are getting 30.6% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (13,660 vs 13,711). GeForce GTX 980 Ti really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.
When does GeForce GTX 980 Ti make more sense than Titan X Pascal?
Yes. GeForce GTX 980 Ti is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is future-proofing and staying closer to $649 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Titan X Pascal. The trade-off is that Titan X Pascal currently gives you a lower G3D Mark (13,660 vs 13,711) and 30.6% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. GeForce GTX 980 Ti still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetGeForce GTX 980 TiTitan X Pascal
1080p
low80 FPS146 FPS
medium69 FPS130 FPS
high56 FPS113 FPS
ultra37 FPS96 FPS
1440p
low70 FPS126 FPS
medium62 FPS103 FPS
high45 FPS88 FPS
ultra28 FPS79 FPS
4K
low26 FPS73 FPS
medium24 FPS62 FPS
high16 FPS47 FPS
ultra14 FPS41 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetGeForce GTX 980 TiTitan X Pascal
1080p
low186 FPS339 FPS
medium164 FPS296 FPS
high133 FPS221 FPS
ultra104 FPS177 FPS
1440p
low128 FPS215 FPS
medium104 FPS187 FPS
high82 FPS152 FPS
ultra62 FPS121 FPS
4K
low60 FPS104 FPS
medium50 FPS88 FPS
high46 FPS73 FPS
ultra37 FPS57 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetGeForce GTX 980 TiTitan X Pascal
1080p
low617 FPS615 FPS
medium494 FPS492 FPS
high411 FPS410 FPS
ultra308 FPS307 FPS
1440p
low463 FPS461 FPS
medium370 FPS369 FPS
high308 FPS307 FPS
ultra231 FPS231 FPS
4K
low308 FPS307 FPS
medium247 FPS246 FPS
high206 FPS205 FPS
ultra154 FPS154 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetGeForce GTX 980 TiTitan X Pascal
1080p
low232 FPS519 FPS
medium197 FPS449 FPS
high161 FPS386 FPS
ultra136 FPS307 FPS
1440p
low177 FPS422 FPS
medium156 FPS367 FPS
high123 FPS299 FPS
ultra102 FPS231 FPS
4K
low102 FPS259 FPS
medium83 FPS246 FPS
high67 FPS205 FPS
ultra53 FPS154 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980 Ti and Titan X Pascal

NVIDIA

GeForce GTX 980 Ti

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 2 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,711 points. Launch price was $649.

NVIDIA

Titan X Pascal

The Titan X Pascal is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 2 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1417 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,660 points. Launch price was $1,199.

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti scores 13,711 and the Titan X Pascal reaches 13,660 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Titan X Pascal uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 3,584 (Titan X Pascal). Raw compute: 6.06 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 10.97 TFLOPS (Titan X Pascal). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1531 MHz.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980 TiTitan X Pascal
G3D Mark Score
13,711
13,660
Architecture
Maxwell 2.0
Pascal
Process Node
28 nm
16 nm
Shading Units
2816
3584+27%
Compute (TFLOPS)
6.06 TFLOPS
10.97 TFLOPS+81%
Boost Clock
1075 MHz
1531 MHz+42%
ROPs
96
96
TMUs
176
224+27%
L1 Cache
1 MB
1.3 MB+30%
L2 Cache
3 MB
3 MB

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Titan X Pascal relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980 TiTitan X Pascal
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
NVIDIA Reflex
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Titan X Pascal has 8 GB. The Titan X Pascal offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 480 GB/s (Titan X Pascal) — a 42.9% advantage for the Titan X Pascal. Bus width: 384-bit vs 384-bit.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980 TiTitan X Pascal
VRAM Capacity
6 GB
8 GB+33%
Memory Type
GDDR5
GDDR5X
Memory Bandwidth
336 GB/s
480 GB/s+43%
Bus Width
384-bit
384-bit
L2 Cache
3 MB
3 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 12.1 (Titan X Pascal). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980 TiTitan X Pascal
DirectX
12.1
12.1
Vulkan
1.1
1.1
OpenGL
4.5
4.5
Max Displays
4
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Titan X Pascal). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Titan X Pascal).

FeatureGeForce GTX 980 TiTitan X Pascal
Encoder
NVENC 3.0
NVENC 5.0 (2x)
Decoder
PureVideo HD VP6
PureVideo HD VP8
Codecs
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti draws 250W versus the Titan X Pascal's 250W — a 0% difference. The Titan X Pascal is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 600W (Titan X Pascal). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.

FeatureGeForce GTX 980 TiTitan X Pascal
TDP
250W
250W
Recommended PSU
600W
600W
Power Connector
6-pin + 8-pin
6-pin + 8-pin
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
111mm
112mm
Slots
2
2
Temp (Load)
85°C
85°C
Perf/Watt
54.8
54.6
💰

Value Analysis

The GeForce GTX 980 Ti launched at $649 MSRP, while the Titan X Pascal launched at $1199. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti costs 45.9% less ($550 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 11.4 (Titan X Pascal) — the GeForce GTX 980 Ti offers 85.1% better value. The Titan X Pascal is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).

FeatureGeForce GTX 980 TiTitan X Pascal
MSRP
$649-46%
$1199
Performance per Dollar
21.1+85%
11.4
Codename
GM200
GP102
Release
June 2 2015
August 2 2016
Ranking
#179
#198