
A10G
Popular choices:

GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
A10G
2021Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌285.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,851 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 288.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
A10G
2021GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,851 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 288.4% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌285.2% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 980 Ti better than A10G?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does A10G make more sense than GeForce GTX 980 Ti?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | A10G | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 80 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 69 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 56 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 37 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 45 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 28 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 26 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 24 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 16 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 14 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | A10G | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 186 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 133 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 346 FPS | 128 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 62 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 60 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 50 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 46 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 37 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | A10G | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 308 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 459 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 231 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 154 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | A10G | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 232 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 197 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 161 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 136 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 459 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 156 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 123 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 102 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 53 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10G and GeForce GTX 980 Ti

A10G
A10G
The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.

GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 2 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,711 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The A10G scores 13,598 and the GeForce GTX 980 Ti reaches 13,711 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The A10G is built on Ampere while the GeForce GTX 980 Ti uses Maxwell 2.0, both on 8 nm vs 28 nm. Shader units: 9,216 (A10G) vs 2,816 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti). Raw compute: 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G) vs 6.06 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980 Ti). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1075 MHz.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,598 | 13,711 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Maxwell 2.0 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 28 nm |
| Shading Units | 9216+227% | 2816 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.52 TFLOPS+420% | 6.06 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz+59% | 1075 MHz |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 288+64% | 176 |
| L1 Cache | 9 MB+800% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The A10G relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The A10G comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce GTX 980 Ti has 6 GB. The A10G offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (A10G) vs 3 MB (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) — the A10G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+300% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR5 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (A10G) vs 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (A10G) vs NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs PureVideo HD VP6. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980 Ti).
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | NVENC 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | PureVideo HD VP6 |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The A10G draws 150W versus the GeForce GTX 980 Ti's 250W — a 50% difference. The A10G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (A10G) vs 600W (GeForce GTX 980 Ti). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 85°C.
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-40% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7+66% | 54.8 |
Value Analysis
The A10G launched at $2500 MSRP, while the GeForce GTX 980 Ti launched at $649. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti costs 74% less ($1851 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (A10G) vs 21.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) — the GeForce GTX 980 Ti offers 290.7% better value. The A10G is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2015).
| Feature | A10G | GeForce GTX 980 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $649-74% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4 | 21.1+291% |
| Codename | GA102 | GM200 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | June 2 2015 |
| Ranking | #182 | #179 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













