
A10G
Popular choices:

Intel Arc Pro B60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
A10G
2021Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Intel Arc Pro B60 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌400% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 27.6 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Intel Arc Pro B60
2025Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,000 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 407.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.6 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
A10G
2021Intel Arc Pro B60
2025Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,000 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 407.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.6 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Intel Arc Pro B60 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌400% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 27.6 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is Intel Arc Pro B60 better than A10G?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is A10G still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | A10G | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 10 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | A10G | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 346 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 25 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | A10G | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 621 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 311 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 459 FPS | 466 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 311 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 233 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 311 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 155 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | A10G | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 621 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 311 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 459 FPS | 466 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 311 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 233 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 311 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 155 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10G and Intel Arc Pro B60

A10G
A10G
The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.

Intel Arc Pro B60
Intel Arc Pro B60
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,807 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The A10G scores 13,598 and the Intel Arc Pro B60 reaches 13,807 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The A10G is built on Ampere while the Intel Arc Pro B60 uses Xe2, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 9,216 (A10G) vs 2,560 (Intel Arc Pro B60). Raw compute: 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G) vs 12.29 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B60). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (A10G) vs 20 (Intel Arc Pro B60) with 288 Tensor cores.
| Feature | A10G | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,598 | 13,807+2% |
| Architecture | Ampere | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 9216+260% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.52 TFLOPS+156% | 12.29 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz | 2400 MHz+40% |
| ROPs | 96+500% | 16 |
| TMUs | 288+80% | 160 |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+260% | 20 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | A10G | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The A10G comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 has 8 GB. The A10G offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (A10G) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B60) — the A10G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | A10G | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+200% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (A10G) vs 12 Ultimate (Intel Arc Pro B60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | A10G | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (A10G) vs Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) (Intel Arc Pro B60). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs Xe Media Engine (Battlemage). Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Intel Arc Pro B60).
| Feature | A10G | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The A10G draws 150W versus the Intel Arc Pro B60's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The A10G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (A10G) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B60). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 82.
| Feature | A10G | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-25% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 82 |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7+31% | 69.0 |
Value Analysis
The A10G launched at $2500 MSRP, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 launched at $500. The Intel Arc Pro B60 costs 80% less ($2000 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (A10G) vs 27.6 (Intel Arc Pro B60) — the Intel Arc Pro B60 offers 411.1% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2021).
| Feature | A10G | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $500-80% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4 | 27.6+411% |
| Codename | GA102 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | September 5 2025 |
| Ranking | #182 | #175 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













