A10G vs Intel Arc Pro B60

A10G

2021Core: 1320 MHzBoost: 1710 MHz

Popular choices:

VS
Intel

Intel Arc Pro B60

2025Core: 2000 MHzBoost: 2400 MHz

Popular choices:

Performance Spectrum - GPU

About G3D Mark

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

A10G

2021

Why buy it

  • 200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
  • Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.

Trade-offs

  • Weaker long-term outlook: Intel Arc Pro B60 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
  • 400% HIGHER MSRP
    $2,500 MSRPvs$500 MSRP
  • Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 27.6 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).

Intel Arc Pro B60

2025

Why buy it

  • Costs $2,000 less on MSRP ($500 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
  • Delivers 407.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 27.6 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
  • More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.

Trade-offs

  • Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
  • 33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

So, is Intel Arc Pro B60 better than A10G?
Yes, but this is not really about a huge raw performance gap. The broader synthetic picture is also very close at 13,598 vs 13,807 in G3D Mark. The bigger reason to prefer Intel Arc Pro B60 is the overall package: you are getting a newer generation, no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Intel Arc Pro B60 is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2021 and a 5nm process instead of 8nm. That makes it the safer long-run choice for modern games.
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Intel Arc Pro B60 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $500 MSRP. Intel Arc Pro B60 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Intel Arc Pro B60 is about $2,000 cheaper on MSRP at $500 MSRP versus $2,500 MSRP, and you are getting 1.5% higher G3D Mark. Moving to $500 MSRP gets you newer hardware, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.
Is A10G still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Yes. A10G is still a strong gaming card in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. Price is really the swing factor here. If you find it at or below $2,500 MSRP, it remains a very sensible buy. Intel Arc Pro B60 is still the safer recommendation for most fresh builds because it offers a cleaner overall package with newer hardware and no meaningful modern upscaling stack.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

PresetA10GIntel Arc Pro B60
1080p
low262 FPS64 FPS
medium251 FPS46 FPS
high214 FPS36 FPS
ultra175 FPS26 FPS
1440p
low238 FPS51 FPS
medium202 FPS29 FPS
high161 FPS19 FPS
ultra132 FPS15 FPS
4K
low134 FPS33 FPS
medium110 FPS20 FPS
high83 FPS14 FPS
ultra76 FPS10 FPS
Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

PresetA10GIntel Arc Pro B60
1080p
low493 FPS216 FPS
medium414 FPS162 FPS
high328 FPS117 FPS
ultra274 FPS79 FPS
1440p
low346 FPS124 FPS
medium277 FPS86 FPS
high225 FPS66 FPS
ultra185 FPS50 FPS
4K
low182 FPS51 FPS
medium151 FPS38 FPS
high128 FPS32 FPS
ultra104 FPS25 FPS
League of Legends

League of Legends

PresetA10GIntel Arc Pro B60
1080p
low612 FPS621 FPS
medium490 FPS497 FPS
high408 FPS414 FPS
ultra306 FPS311 FPS
1440p
low459 FPS466 FPS
medium367 FPS373 FPS
high306 FPS311 FPS
ultra229 FPS233 FPS
4K
low306 FPS311 FPS
medium245 FPS249 FPS
high204 FPS207 FPS
ultra153 FPS155 FPS
Valorant

Valorant

PresetA10GIntel Arc Pro B60
1080p
low612 FPS621 FPS
medium490 FPS497 FPS
high408 FPS414 FPS
ultra306 FPS311 FPS
1440p
low459 FPS466 FPS
medium367 FPS373 FPS
high306 FPS311 FPS
ultra229 FPS233 FPS
4K
low306 FPS311 FPS
medium245 FPS249 FPS
high204 FPS207 FPS
ultra153 FPS155 FPS

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10G and Intel Arc Pro B60

NVIDIA

A10G

The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.

Intel

Intel Arc Pro B60

The Intel Arc Pro B60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,807 points. Launch price was $499.

Graphics Performance

The A10G scores 13,598 and the Intel Arc Pro B60 reaches 13,807 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The A10G is built on Ampere while the Intel Arc Pro B60 uses Xe2, both on 8 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 9,216 (A10G) vs 2,560 (Intel Arc Pro B60). Raw compute: 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G) vs 12.29 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B60). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 2400 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (A10G) vs 20 (Intel Arc Pro B60) with 288 Tensor cores.

FeatureA10GIntel Arc Pro B60
G3D Mark Score
13,598
13,807+2%
Architecture
Ampere
Xe2
Process Node
8 nm
5 nm
Shading Units
9216+260%
2560
Compute (TFLOPS)
31.52 TFLOPS+156%
12.29 TFLOPS
Boost Clock
1710 MHz
2400 MHz+40%
ROPs
96+500%
16
TMUs
288+80%
160
L2 Cache
6 MB+50%
4 MB
Ray Tracing Cores
72+260%
20

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

FeatureA10GIntel Arc Pro B60
Upscaling Tech
Upscaling support
Upscaling support
Frame Generation
Not Supported
Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction
No
No
Low Latency
Standard
Standard
💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The A10G comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 has 8 GB. The A10G offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (A10G) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B60) — the A10G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

FeatureA10GIntel Arc Pro B60
VRAM Capacity
24 GB+200%
8 GB
Memory Type
GDDR6
GDDR6
Bus Width
128-bit
128-bit
L2 Cache
6 MB+50%
4 MB
🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (A10G) vs 12 Ultimate (Intel Arc Pro B60). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

FeatureA10GIntel Arc Pro B60
DirectX
12 Ultimate
12 Ultimate
Vulkan
1.3
1.3
OpenGL
4.6
4.6
Max Displays
0
4
🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (A10G) vs Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) (Intel Arc Pro B60). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs Xe Media Engine (Battlemage). Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Intel Arc Pro B60).

FeatureA10GIntel Arc Pro B60
Encoder
NVENC 7th Gen
Xe Media Engine (Battlemage)
Decoder
NVDEC 5th Gen
Xe Media Engine (Battlemage)
Codecs
AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9
H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9
🔌

Power & Dimensions

The A10G draws 150W versus the Intel Arc Pro B60's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The A10G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (A10G) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B60). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 82.

FeatureA10GIntel Arc Pro B60
TDP
150W-25%
200W
Recommended PSU
500W
500W
Power Connector
PCIe-powered
PCIe-powered
Length
267mm
267mm
Height
112mm
112mm
Slots
1-50%
2
Temp (Load)
Unknown-100%
82
Perf/Watt
90.7+31%
69.0
💰

Value Analysis

The A10G launched at $2500 MSRP, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 launched at $500. The Intel Arc Pro B60 costs 80% less ($2000 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (A10G) vs 27.6 (Intel Arc Pro B60) — the Intel Arc Pro B60 offers 411.1% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2021).

FeatureA10GIntel Arc Pro B60
MSRP
$2500
$500-80%
Performance per Dollar
5.4
27.6+411%
Codename
GA102
BMG-G21
Release
April 12 2021
September 5 2025
Ranking
#182
#175