
A10G
Popular choices:

RTX A2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
A10G
2021Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌455.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 29.9 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 70W.
- ❌59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.
RTX A2000
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,050 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 450.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.9 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 150W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
A10G
2021RTX A2000
2021Why buy it
- ✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅Costs $2,050 less on MSRP ($450 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 450.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 29.9 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 150W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌455.6% HIGHER MSRP$2,500 MSRPvs$450 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 29.9 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 70W.
- ❌59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is A10G better than RTX A2000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is RTX A2000 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | A10G | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | A10G | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 346 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 34 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | A10G | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 485 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 404 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 303 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 459 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 147 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | A10G | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 459 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10G and RTX A2000

A10G
A10G
The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.

RTX A2000
RTX A2000
The RTX A2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 10 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,464 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The A10G scores 13,598 and the RTX A2000 reaches 13,464 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The A10G is built on Ampere while the RTX A2000 uses Ampere, both on a 8 nm process. Shader units: 9,216 (A10G) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000). Raw compute: 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1200 MHz. Ray tracing: 72 RT cores (A10G) vs 26 (RTX A2000) with 288 Tensor cores vs 104.
| Feature | A10G | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,598 | 13,464 |
| Architecture | Ampere | Ampere |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 9216+177% | 3328 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.52 TFLOPS+295% | 7.987 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz+43% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+100% | 48 |
| TMUs | 288+177% | 104 |
| L1 Cache | 9 MB+173% | 3.3 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB |
| Ray Tracing Cores | 72+177% | 26 |
| Tensor Cores | 288+177% | 104 |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A2000 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The A10G relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | A10G | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The A10G comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the RTX A2000 has 8 GB. The A10G offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (A10G) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000) — the A10G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | A10G | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB+200% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+100% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (A10G) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 6.
| Feature | A10G | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 6 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (A10G) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000).
| Feature | A10G | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The A10G draws 150W versus the RTX A2000's 70W — a 72.7% difference. The RTX A2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (A10G) vs 500W (RTX A2000). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 75°C.
| Feature | A10G | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 70W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 167mm |
| Height | 112mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 1-50% | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7 | 192.3+112% |
Value Analysis
The A10G launched at $2500 MSRP, while the RTX A2000 launched at $450. The RTX A2000 costs 82% less ($2050 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (A10G) vs 29.9 (RTX A2000) — the RTX A2000 offers 453.7% better value.
| Feature | A10G | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500 | $450-82% |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4 | 29.9+454% |
| Codename | GA102 | GA106 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | August 10 2021 |
| Ranking | #182 | #186 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













