G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

A10G

2021

Why buy it

✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 150W instead of 295W, a 145W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌
401% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Radeon RX Vega 64

2017

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,001 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 413.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.0 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌96.7% higher power demand at 295W vs 150W.

A10G

2021

Radeon RX Vega 64

2017

Why buy it

✅200% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 150W instead of 295W, a 145W reduction.

Why buy it

✅Costs $2,001 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
✅Delivers 413.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.0 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌
401% HIGHER MSRP
$2,500 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 5.4 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌96.7% higher power demand at 295W vs 150W.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX Vega 64 better than A10G?

Yes. Radeon RX Vega 64 is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 13,949 vs 13,598 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon RX Vega 64 is a 2017 card with FSR upscaling, while A10G is a 2021 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

A10G is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2017, more VRAM at 24 GB instead of 8 GB, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 8nm process instead of 14nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX Vega 64 can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $499 MSRP. Radeon RX Vega 64 is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon RX Vega 64 is about $2,001 cheaper on MSRP at $499 MSRP versus $2,500 MSRP, and you are getting 2.6% higher G3D Mark. A10G is the newer 2021 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (150W vs 295W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does A10G make more sense than Radeon RX Vega 64?

Yes. A10G is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (150W vs 295W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $2,500 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon RX Vega 64. The trade-off is that Radeon RX Vega 64 currently gives you 2.6% higher G3D Mark. It also leads G3D-per-dollar by 413.9%.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

A10G Benchmark Check

Radeon RX Vega 64 Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	A10G	Radeon RX Vega 64
1080p
low	262 FPS	141 FPS
medium	251 FPS	126 FPS
high	214 FPS	108 FPS
ultra	175 FPS	90 FPS
1440p
low	238 FPS	122 FPS
medium	202 FPS	100 FPS
high	161 FPS	83 FPS
ultra	132 FPS	71 FPS
4K
low	134 FPS	68 FPS
medium	110 FPS	57 FPS
high	83 FPS	43 FPS
ultra	76 FPS	37 FPS

Open A10G Open Radeon RX Vega 64

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	A10G	Radeon RX Vega 64
1080p
low	493 FPS	317 FPS
medium	414 FPS	279 FPS
high	328 FPS	224 FPS
ultra	274 FPS	186 FPS
1440p
low	346 FPS	215 FPS
medium	277 FPS	187 FPS
high	225 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	185 FPS	128 FPS
4K
low	182 FPS	103 FPS
medium	151 FPS	88 FPS
high	128 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	104 FPS	57 FPS

Open A10G Open Radeon RX Vega 64

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	A10G	Radeon RX Vega 64
1080p
low	612 FPS	628 FPS
medium	490 FPS	502 FPS
high	408 FPS	418 FPS
ultra	306 FPS	314 FPS
1440p
low	459 FPS	471 FPS
medium	367 FPS	377 FPS
high	306 FPS	314 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	235 FPS
4K
low	306 FPS	314 FPS
medium	245 FPS	251 FPS
high	204 FPS	209 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	157 FPS

Open A10G Open Radeon RX Vega 64

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	A10G	Radeon RX Vega 64
1080p
low	612 FPS	391 FPS
medium	490 FPS	347 FPS
high	408 FPS	295 FPS
ultra	306 FPS	236 FPS
1440p
low	459 FPS	314 FPS
medium	367 FPS	279 FPS
high	306 FPS	228 FPS
ultra	229 FPS	181 FPS
4K
low	306 FPS	200 FPS
medium	245 FPS	188 FPS
high	204 FPS	152 FPS
ultra	153 FPS	127 FPS

Open A10G Open Radeon RX Vega 64

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of A10G and Radeon RX Vega 64

A10G

The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.

Radeon RX Vega 64

The Radeon RX Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,949 points. Launch price was $499.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The A10G scores 13,598 and the Radeon RX Vega 64 reaches 13,949 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The A10G is built on Ampere while the Radeon RX Vega 64 uses GCN 5.0, both on 8 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 9,216 (A10G) vs 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Raw compute: 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G) vs 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 64). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1546 MHz.

Feature	A10G	Radeon RX Vega 64
G3D Mark Score	13,598	13,949+3%
Architecture	Ampere	GCN 5.0
Process Node	8 nm	14 nm
Shading Units	9216+125%	4096
Compute (TFLOPS)	31.52 TFLOPS+149%	12.66 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1710 MHz+11%	1546 MHz
ROPs	96+50%	64
TMUs	288+13%	256
L1 Cache	9 MB+800%	1 MB
L2 Cache	6 MB+50%	4 MB

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

Feature	A10G	Radeon RX Vega 64
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	Standard	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The A10G comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX Vega 64 has 8 GB. The A10G offers 200% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 2048-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (A10G) vs 4 MB (Radeon RX Vega 64) — the A10G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	A10G	Radeon RX Vega 64
VRAM Capacity	24 GB+200%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	HBM2
Bus Width	128-bit	2048-bit+1500%
L2 Cache	6 MB+50%	4 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (A10G) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	A10G	Radeon RX Vega 64
DirectX	12 Ultimate	12.1
Vulkan	1.3+18%	1.1
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	0	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (A10G) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 64).

Feature	A10G	Radeon RX Vega 64
Encoder	NVENC 7th Gen	VCE 4.0
Decoder	NVDEC 5th Gen	UVD 7.0
Codecs	AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The A10G draws 150W versus the Radeon RX Vega 64's 295W — a 65.2% difference. The A10G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (A10G) vs 750W (Radeon RX Vega 64). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 85°C.

Feature	A10G	Radeon RX Vega 64
TDP	150W-49%	295W
Recommended PSU	500W-33%	750W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	2x 8-pin
Length	267mm	267mm
Height	112mm	111mm
Slots	1-50%	2
Temp (Load)	Unknown-100%	85°C
Perf/Watt	90.7+92%	47.3

💰

Value Analysis

The A10G launched at $2500 MSRP, while the Radeon RX Vega 64 launched at $499. The Radeon RX Vega 64 costs 80% less ($2001 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (A10G) vs 28.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64) — the Radeon RX Vega 64 offers 418.5% better value. The A10G is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).