
A10G
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
A10G
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,899 less on MSRP ($2,500 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 70.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 475W, a 325W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌76% HIGHER MSRP$4,399 MSRPvs$2,500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($4,399 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ❌216.7% higher power demand at 475W vs 150W.
A10G
2021Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,899 less on MSRP ($2,500 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 70.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 5.4 vs 3.2 G3D/$ ($2,500 MSRP vs $4,399 MSRP).
- ✅100+% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (24 GB vs Unknown).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 475W, a 325W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with Unknown vs 24 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2019-era hardware with Unknown of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌76% HIGHER MSRP$4,399 MSRPvs$2,500 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 3.2 vs 5.4 G3D/$ ($4,399 MSRP vs $2,500 MSRP).
- ❌216.7% higher power demand at 475W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro Vega II Duo better than A10G?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does A10G make more sense than Radeon Pro Vega II Duo?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 262 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 251 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 214 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 175 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 238 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 202 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 132 FPS | 64 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 54 FPS |
| medium | 110 FPS | 47 FPS |
| high | 83 FPS | 38 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 493 FPS | 381 FPS |
| medium | 414 FPS | 326 FPS |
| high | 328 FPS | 258 FPS |
| ultra | 274 FPS | 210 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 346 FPS | 246 FPS |
| medium | 277 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 225 FPS | 176 FPS |
| ultra | 185 FPS | 143 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 182 FPS | 114 FPS |
| medium | 151 FPS | 96 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 62 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 538 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 459 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 389 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 459 FPS | 417 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 350 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 237 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 261 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 216 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 174 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 136 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 612 FPS | 386 FPS |
| medium | 490 FPS | 317 FPS |
| high | 408 FPS | 270 FPS |
| ultra | 306 FPS | 234 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 459 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 367 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 306 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 229 FPS | 175 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 306 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 245 FPS | 153 FPS |
| high | 204 FPS | 132 FPS |
| ultra | 153 FPS | 110 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of A10G and Radeon Pro Vega II Duo

A10G
A10G
The A10G is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1320 MHz to 1710 MHz. It has 9216 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 72 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,598 points.

Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
Radeon Pro Vega II Duo
The Radeon Pro Vega II Duo is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 3 2019. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1720 MHz. It has 4096 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 475W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,018 points. Launch price was $4,399.
Graphics Performance
The A10G scores 13,598 and the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo reaches 14,018 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The A10G is built on Ampere while the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo uses GCN 5.1, both on 8 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 9,216 (A10G) vs 4,096 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Raw compute: 31.52 TFLOPS (A10G) vs 14.09 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Boost clocks: 1710 MHz vs 1720 MHz.
| Feature | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,598 | 14,018+3% |
| Architecture | Ampere | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 8 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 9216+125% | 4096 ×2 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 31.52 TFLOPS+124% | 14.09 TFLOPS ×2 |
| Boost Clock | 1710 MHz | 1720 MHz |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 ×2 |
| TMUs | 288+13% | 256 ×2 |
| L1 Cache | 9 MB+800% | 1 MB |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | Standard | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The A10G comes with 24 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo has 0 MB. The A10G offers 100+% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 6 MB (A10G) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) — the A10G has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 24 GB | Shared System RAM |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 384-bit+200% |
| L2 Cache | 6 MB+50% | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (A10G) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 8.
| Feature | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 8 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 7th Gen (A10G) vs VCE 4.1 (2x) (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Decoder: NVDEC 5th Gen vs UVD 7.2 (2x). Supported codecs: AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 (A10G) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo).
| Feature | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 7th Gen | VCE 4.1 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 5th Gen | UVD 7.2 (2x) |
| Codecs | AV1,H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The A10G draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo's 475W — a 104% difference. The A10G is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (A10G) vs 1W (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Integrated. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 1 vs 4 slots. Typical load temperature: Unknown vs 85°C.
| Feature | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-68% | 475W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 1W-100% |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Integrated |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 120mm |
| Slots | 1-75% | 4 |
| Temp (Load) | Unknown-100% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.7+207% | 29.5 |
Value Analysis
The A10G launched at $2500 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro Vega II Duo launched at $4399. The A10G costs 43.2% less ($1899 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 5.4 (A10G) vs 3.2 (Radeon Pro Vega II Duo) — the A10G offers 68.8% better value. The A10G is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | A10G | Radeon Pro Vega II Duo |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $2500-43% | $4399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 5.4+69% | 3.2 |
| Codename | GA102 | Vega 20 |
| Release | April 12 2021 | June 3 2019 |
| Ranking | #182 | #170 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













