
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Popular choices:

RadeonT RX 6850M XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $351 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 51% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RadeonT RX 6850M XT across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌51.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 165W.
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅43.7% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 250W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌54.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015RadeonT RX 6850M XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $351 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 51% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅43.7% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 250W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RadeonT RX 6850M XT across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌51.5% higher power demand at 250W vs 165W.
Trade-offs
- ❌54.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RadeonT RX 6850M XT better than GeForce GTX 980 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 980 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 243 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 69 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 494 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 463 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 157 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 232 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 157 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980 Ti and RadeonT RX 6850M XT

GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 2 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,711 points. Launch price was $649.

RadeonT RX 6850M XT
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,992 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti scores 13,711 and the RadeonT RX 6850M XT reaches 13,992 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on 28 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 2,560 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Raw compute: 6.06 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 13.21 TFLOPS (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 2581 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,711 | 13,992+2% |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816+10% | 2560 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.06 TFLOPS | 13.21 TFLOPS+118% |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 2581 MHz+140% |
| ROPs | 96+50% | 64 |
| TMUs | 176+10% | 160 |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB+100% | 0.5 MB |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT has 12 GB. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 384-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 12 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 384-bit+200% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 12.2 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 1.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.6+2% |
| Max Displays | 4+300% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs VCN 3.0 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti draws 250W versus the RadeonT RX 6850M XT's 165W — a 41% difference. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 500W (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 165W-34% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 54.8 | 84.8+55% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti launched at $649 MSRP, while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT launched at $1000. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti costs 35.1% less ($351 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 14.0 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) — the GeForce GTX 980 Ti offers 50.7% better value. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649-35% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.1+51% | 14.0 |
| Codename | GM200 | Navi 22 |
| Release | June 2 2015 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #179 | #103 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













