
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
Popular choices:

Quadro GP100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,351 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 978.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro GP100 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quadro GP100
2016Why buy it
- ✅39.1% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌978.6% HIGHER MSRP$7,000 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($7,000 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
2015Quadro GP100
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,351 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 978.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 21.1 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅39.1% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅166.7% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro GP100 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2015-era hardware with 6 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌978.6% HIGHER MSRP$7,000 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 21.1 G3D/$ ($7,000 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro GP100 better than GeForce GTX 980 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 980 Ti make more sense than Quadro GP100?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 80 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 69 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 56 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 70 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 45 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 28 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 26 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 24 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 16 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 14 FPS | 61 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 186 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 133 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 128 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 62 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 60 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 50 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 46 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 37 FPS | 59 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 617 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 494 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 411 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 308 FPS | 308 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 463 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 370 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 308 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 231 FPS | 231 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 308 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 206 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 154 FPS | 154 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 232 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 197 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 161 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 136 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 156 FPS | 337 FPS |
| high | 123 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 102 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 102 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 67 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 53 FPS | 146 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 980 Ti and Quadro GP100

GeForce GTX 980 Ti
GeForce GTX 980 Ti
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 2 2015. It features the Maxwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1075 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 28 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,711 points. Launch price was $649.

Quadro GP100
Quadro GP100
The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti scores 13,711 and the Quadro GP100 reaches 13,710 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti is built on Maxwell 2.0 while the Quadro GP100 uses Pascal, both on 28 nm vs 16 nm. Shader units: 2,816 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 3,584 (Quadro GP100). Raw compute: 6.06 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100). Boost clocks: 1075 MHz vs 1442 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,711 | 13,710 |
| Architecture | Maxwell 2.0 | Pascal |
| Process Node | 28 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 2816 | 3584+27% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.06 TFLOPS | 10.34 TFLOPS+71% |
| Boost Clock | 1075 MHz | 1442 MHz+34% |
| ROPs | 96 | 96 |
| TMUs | 176 | 224+27% |
| L1 Cache | 1 MB | 1.3 MB+30% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro GP100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro GP100 has 16 GB. The Quadro GP100 offers 166.7% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 336 GB/s (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 1024 GB/s (Quadro GP100) — a 204.8% advantage for the Quadro GP100. Bus width: 384-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 4 MB (Quadro GP100) — the Quadro GP100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 16 GB+167% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 336 GB/s | 1024 GB/s+205% |
| Bus Width | 384-bit | 4096-bit+967% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 12 (Quadro GP100). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.5 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.5 | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 3.0 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100). Decoder: PureVideo HD VP6 vs NVDEC 3rd gen. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 3.0 | NVENC 4th gen |
| Decoder | PureVideo HD VP6 | NVDEC 3rd gen |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti draws 250W versus the Quadro GP100's 235W — a 6.2% difference. The Quadro GP100 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 600W (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 500W (Quadro GP100). Power connectors: 6-pin + 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 250W | 235W-6% |
| Recommended PSU | 600W | 500W-17% |
| Power Connector | 6-pin + 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 54.8 | 58.3+6% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 980 Ti launched at $649 MSRP, while the Quadro GP100 launched at $7000. The GeForce GTX 980 Ti costs 90.7% less ($6351 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 21.1 (GeForce GTX 980 Ti) vs 2.0 (Quadro GP100) — the GeForce GTX 980 Ti offers 955% better value. The Quadro GP100 is the newer GPU (2016 vs 2015).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 980 Ti | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $649-91% | $7000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 21.1+955% | 2.0 |
| Codename | GM200 | GP100 |
| Release | June 2 2015 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #179 | #178 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













