
GeForce GTX 1070
Popular choices:

RTX A2000
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1070
2016Why buy it
- ✅2.6% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 19.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.6 vs 29.9 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 70W.
- ❌59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.
RTX A2000
2021Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 150W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1070 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌18.7% HIGHER MSRP$450 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 29.9 vs 35.6 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1070
2016RTX A2000
2021Why buy it
- ✅2.6% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $71 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 19.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.6 vs 29.9 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $450 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 150W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 70W.
- ❌59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1070 across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌18.7% HIGHER MSRP$450 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 29.9 vs 35.6 G3D/$ ($450 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce GTX 1070 better than RTX A2000?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does RTX A2000 make more sense than GeForce GTX 1070?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 34 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 608 FPS | 606 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 485 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 404 FPS |
| ultra | 304 FPS | 303 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 304 FPS | 303 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 304 FPS | 303 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 147 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 395 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 278 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 328 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 275 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 and RTX A2000

GeForce GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070
The GeForce GTX 1070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,507 points. Launch price was $379.

RTX A2000
RTX A2000
The RTX A2000 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 10 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,464 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1070 scores 13,507 and the RTX A2000 reaches 13,464 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 is built on Pascal while the RTX A2000 uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000). Raw compute: 6.463 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,507 | 13,464 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 3328+73% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.463 TFLOPS | 7.987 TFLOPS+24% |
| Boost Clock | 1683 MHz+40% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 120+15% | 104 |
| L1 Cache | 0.7 MB | 3.3 MB+371% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000) — the RTX A2000 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 draws 150W versus the RTX A2000's 70W — a 72.7% difference. The RTX A2000 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 500W (RTX A2000). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 70W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 167mm |
| Height | 112mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.0 | 192.3+114% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1070 launched at $379 MSRP, while the RTX A2000 launched at $450. The GeForce GTX 1070 costs 15.8% less ($71 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.6 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 29.9 (RTX A2000) — the GeForce GTX 1070 offers 19.1% better value. The RTX A2000 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX A2000 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379-16% | $450 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.6+19% | 29.9 |
| Codename | GP104 | GA106 |
| Release | June 10 2016 | August 10 2021 |
| Ranking | #185 | #186 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













