
GeForce GTX 1070
Popular choices:

Intel Arc Pro B60
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1070
2016Why buy it
- ✅10.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $121 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 29.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.6 vs 27.6 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Intel Arc Pro B60
2025Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌31.9% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 35.6 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
GeForce GTX 1070
2016Intel Arc Pro B60
2025Why buy it
- ✅10.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $121 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 29.1% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.6 vs 27.6 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $500 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅More future proof: Xe2 (2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌31.9% HIGHER MSRP$500 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 27.6 vs 35.6 G3D/$ ($500 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is Intel Arc Pro B60 better than GeForce GTX 1070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1070 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 64 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 46 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 36 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 26 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 29 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 19 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 15 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 33 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 20 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 14 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 10 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 162 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 117 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 124 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 66 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 50 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 51 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 38 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 32 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 25 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 608 FPS | 621 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 304 FPS | 311 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 466 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 304 FPS | 311 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 233 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 304 FPS | 311 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 155 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 395 FPS | 621 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 497 FPS |
| high | 278 FPS | 414 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 311 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 328 FPS | 466 FPS |
| medium | 275 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 311 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 233 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 311 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 249 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 155 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 and Intel Arc Pro B60

GeForce GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070
The GeForce GTX 1070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,507 points. Launch price was $379.

Intel Arc Pro B60
Intel Arc Pro B60
The Intel Arc Pro B60 is manufactured by Intel. It was released in September 5 2025. It features the Xe2 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2000 MHz to 2400 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,807 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1070 scores 13,507 and the Intel Arc Pro B60 reaches 13,807 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 is built on Pascal while the Intel Arc Pro B60 uses Xe2, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 2,560 (Intel Arc Pro B60). Raw compute: 6.463 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 12.29 TFLOPS (Intel Arc Pro B60). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 2400 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,507 | 13,807+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Xe2 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 2560+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.463 TFLOPS | 12.29 TFLOPS+90% |
| Boost Clock | 1683 MHz | 2400 MHz+43% |
| ROPs | 64+300% | 16 |
| TMUs | 120 | 160+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Intel Arc Pro B60 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 4 MB (Intel Arc Pro B60) — the Intel Arc Pro B60 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 12 Ultimate (Intel Arc Pro B60). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1070) vs Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) (Intel Arc Pro B60). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs Xe Media Engine (Battlemage). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Intel Arc Pro B60).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | Xe Media Engine (Battlemage) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 draws 150W versus the Intel Arc Pro B60's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 500W (Intel Arc Pro B60). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 82.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-25% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-9% | 82 |
| Perf/Watt | 90.0+30% | 69.0 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1070 launched at $379 MSRP, while the Intel Arc Pro B60 launched at $500. The GeForce GTX 1070 costs 24.2% less ($121 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.6 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 27.6 (Intel Arc Pro B60) — the GeForce GTX 1070 offers 29% better value. The Intel Arc Pro B60 is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Intel Arc Pro B60 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379-24% | $500 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.6+29% | 27.6 |
| Codename | GP104 | BMG-G21 |
| Release | June 10 2016 | September 5 2025 |
| Ranking | #185 | #175 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













