
GeForce GTX 1070
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1070
2016Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 80W.
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
2020Why buy it
- ✅7.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 150W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 35.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1070
2016GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
2020Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅7.5% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 80W instead of 150W, a 70W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌87.5% higher power demand at 150W vs 80W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 35.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design better than GeForce GTX 1070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1070 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 111 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 52 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 94 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 79 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 39 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 252 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 213 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 179 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 154 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 197 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 163 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 115 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 79 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 608 FPS | 605 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 484 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 403 FPS |
| ultra | 304 FPS | 302 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 454 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 363 FPS |
| high | 304 FPS | 302 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 227 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 304 FPS | 302 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 242 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 202 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 151 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 395 FPS | 247 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 214 FPS |
| high | 278 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 328 FPS | 189 FPS |
| medium | 275 FPS | 167 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 112 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 94 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 58 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 and GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design

GeForce GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070
The GeForce GTX 1070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,507 points. Launch price was $379.

GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 2 2020. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 930 MHz to 1155 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 80W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,444 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1070 scores 13,507 and the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design reaches 13,444 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design). Raw compute: 6.463 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 5.914 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 1155 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,507 | 13,444 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 2560+33% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.463 TFLOPS+9% | 5.914 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1683 MHz+46% | 1155 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 120 | 160+33% |
| L1 Cache | 0.7 MB | 2.5 MB+257% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1070 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 352 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) — a 37.5% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design) — the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 352 GB/s+38% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 12 Ultimate (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1070) vs NVENC 7th Gen (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs NVDEC 4th Gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | NVENC 7th Gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | NVDEC 4th Gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design's 80W — a 60.9% difference. The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 80W-47% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 90.0 | 168.1+87% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce RTX 2070 Super with Max-Q Design |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379 | — |
| Codename | GP104 | TU104 |
| Release | June 10 2016 | April 2 2020 |
| Ranking | #185 | #188 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













