
GeForce GTX 1070
Popular choices:

Quadro GP100
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1070
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,621 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1719.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.6 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 235W, a 85W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro GP100 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Quadro GP100
2016Why buy it
- ✅29.7% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1747% HIGHER MSRP$7,000 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 35.6 G3D/$ ($7,000 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ❌56.7% higher power demand at 235W vs 150W.
GeForce GTX 1070
2016Quadro GP100
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $6,621 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 1719.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.6 vs 2.0 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $7,000 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 235W, a 85W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅29.7% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Pascal (2016−2021) on 16nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Quadro GP100 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 16 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌1747% HIGHER MSRP$7,000 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 2.0 vs 35.6 G3D/$ ($7,000 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ❌56.7% higher power demand at 235W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is Quadro GP100 better than GeForce GTX 1070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1070 make more sense than Quadro GP100?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 190 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 177 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 177 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 149 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 108 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 67 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 61 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 313 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 274 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 207 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 171 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 181 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 118 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 59 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 608 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 411 FPS |
| ultra | 304 FPS | 308 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 370 FPS |
| high | 304 FPS | 308 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 231 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 304 FPS | 308 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 206 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 154 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 395 FPS | 455 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 417 FPS |
| high | 278 FPS | 334 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 286 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 328 FPS | 365 FPS |
| medium | 275 FPS | 337 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 259 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 218 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 234 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 218 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 177 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 146 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 and Quadro GP100

GeForce GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070
The GeForce GTX 1070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,507 points. Launch price was $379.

Quadro GP100
Quadro GP100
The Quadro GP100 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in October 1 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1304 MHz to 1442 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 235W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,710 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1070 scores 13,507 and the Quadro GP100 reaches 13,710 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 is built on Pascal while the Quadro GP100 uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 3,584 (Quadro GP100). Raw compute: 6.463 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 10.34 TFLOPS (Quadro GP100). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 1442 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,507 | 13,710+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 3584+87% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.463 TFLOPS | 10.34 TFLOPS+60% |
| Boost Clock | 1683 MHz+17% | 1442 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 120 | 224+87% |
| L1 Cache | 0.7 MB | 1.3 MB+86% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Quadro GP100 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Quadro GP100 has 16 GB. The Quadro GP100 offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 1024 GB/s (Quadro GP100) — a 300% advantage for the Quadro GP100. Bus width: 256-bit vs 4096-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 4 MB (Quadro GP100) — the Quadro GP100 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | HBM2 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 1024 GB/s+300% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 4096-bit+1500% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 12 (Quadro GP100). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1070) vs NVENC 4th gen (Quadro GP100). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs NVDEC 3rd gen. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 (Quadro GP100).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | NVENC 4th gen |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | NVDEC 3rd gen |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,MPEG-2,VC-1,VP8,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 draws 150W versus the Quadro GP100's 235W — a 44.2% difference. The GeForce GTX 1070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 500W (Quadro GP100). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-36% | 235W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.0+54% | 58.3 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1070 launched at $379 MSRP, while the Quadro GP100 launched at $7000. The GeForce GTX 1070 costs 94.6% less ($6621 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.6 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 2.0 (Quadro GP100) — the GeForce GTX 1070 offers 1680% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Quadro GP100 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379-95% | $7000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.6+1680% | 2.0 |
| Codename | GP104 | GP100 |
| Release | June 10 2016 | October 1 2016 |
| Ranking | #185 | #178 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













