
GeForce GTX 1070
Popular choices:

Titan X Pascal
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1070
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $820 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 212.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.6 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Titan X Pascal across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Titan X Pascal
2016Why buy it
- ✅19.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌216.4% HIGHER MSRP$1,199 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 35.6 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
GeForce GTX 1070
2016Titan X Pascal
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $820 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 212.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.6 vs 11.4 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $1,199 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅19.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Titan X Pascal across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌216.4% HIGHER MSRP$1,199 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 11.4 vs 35.6 G3D/$ ($1,199 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is Titan X Pascal better than GeForce GTX 1070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does GeForce GTX 1070 make more sense than Titan X Pascal?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 130 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 96 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 103 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 79 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 296 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 221 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 177 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 121 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 104 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 608 FPS | 615 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 492 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 410 FPS |
| ultra | 304 FPS | 307 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 461 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 369 FPS |
| high | 304 FPS | 307 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 231 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 304 FPS | 307 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 154 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 395 FPS | 519 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 449 FPS |
| high | 278 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 307 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 328 FPS | 422 FPS |
| medium | 275 FPS | 367 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 299 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 231 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 259 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 246 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 205 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 154 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 and Titan X Pascal

GeForce GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070
The GeForce GTX 1070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,507 points. Launch price was $379.

Titan X Pascal
Titan X Pascal
The Titan X Pascal is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 2 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1417 MHz to 1531 MHz. It has 3584 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,660 points. Launch price was $1,199.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1070 scores 13,507 and the Titan X Pascal reaches 13,660 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 is built on Pascal while the Titan X Pascal uses Pascal, both on a 16 nm process. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 3,584 (Titan X Pascal). Raw compute: 6.463 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 10.97 TFLOPS (Titan X Pascal). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 1531 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,507 | 13,660+1% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Pascal |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 16 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 3584+87% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.463 TFLOPS | 10.97 TFLOPS+70% |
| Boost Clock | 1683 MHz+10% | 1531 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 96+50% |
| TMUs | 120 | 224+87% |
| L1 Cache | 0.7 MB | 1.3 MB+86% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Titan X Pascal relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | Standard |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 480 GB/s (Titan X Pascal) — a 87.5% advantage for the Titan X Pascal. Bus width: 256-bit vs 384-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 3 MB (Titan X Pascal) — the Titan X Pascal has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR5X |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 480 GB/s+88% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 384-bit+50% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 12.1 (Titan X Pascal). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.5. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+27% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6+2% | 4.5 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1070) vs NVENC 5.0 (2x) (Titan X Pascal). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs PureVideo HD VP8. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC (Titan X Pascal).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | NVENC 5.0 (2x) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | PureVideo HD VP8 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 draws 150W versus the Titan X Pascal's 250W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 600W (Titan X Pascal). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-40% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.0+65% | 54.6 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1070 launched at $379 MSRP, while the Titan X Pascal launched at $1199. The GeForce GTX 1070 costs 68.4% less ($820 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.6 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 11.4 (Titan X Pascal) — the GeForce GTX 1070 offers 212.3% better value.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Titan X Pascal |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379-68% | $1199 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.6+212% | 11.4 |
| Codename | GP104 | GP102 |
| Release | June 10 2016 | August 2 2016 |
| Ranking | #185 | #198 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













