
GeForce GTX 1070
Popular choices:

RTX A2000 12GB
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1070
2016Why buy it
- ✅2.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 16.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.6 vs 30.6 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 70W.
- ❌59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.
RTX A2000 12GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 150W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌18.5% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.6 vs 35.6 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1070
2016RTX A2000 12GB
2021Why buy it
- ✅2.4% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $70 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 16.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.6 vs 30.6 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 150W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 70W.
- ❌59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce GTX 1070 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌18.5% HIGHER MSRP$449 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 30.6 vs 35.6 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A2000 12GB better than GeForce GTX 1070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1070 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 92 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 76 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 51 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 92 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 78 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 38 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 38 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 35 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 22 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 18 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 164 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 106 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 95 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 70 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 55 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 34 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 608 FPS | 617 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 494 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 412 FPS |
| ultra | 304 FPS | 309 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 361 FPS |
| high | 304 FPS | 306 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 232 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 304 FPS | 309 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 147 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 395 FPS | 245 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 212 FPS |
| high | 278 FPS | 172 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 144 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 328 FPS | 187 FPS |
| medium | 275 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 130 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 106 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 71 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 56 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 and RTX A2000 12GB

GeForce GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070
The GeForce GTX 1070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,507 points. Launch price was $379.

RTX A2000 12GB
RTX A2000 12GB
The RTX A2000 12GB is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 23 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 562 MHz to 1200 MHz. It has 3328 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 26 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,721 points. Launch price was $449.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1070 scores 13,507 and the RTX A2000 12GB reaches 13,721 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 is built on Pascal while the RTX A2000 12GB uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 3,328 (RTX A2000 12GB). Raw compute: 6.463 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 7.987 TFLOPS (RTX A2000 12GB). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 1200 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,507 | 13,721+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 3328+73% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.463 TFLOPS | 7.987 TFLOPS+24% |
| Boost Clock | 1683 MHz+40% | 1200 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 120+15% | 104 |
| L1 Cache | 0.7 MB | 3.3 MB+371% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 3 MB (RTX A2000 12GB) — the RTX A2000 12GB has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 12.2 (RTX A2000 12GB). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A2000 12GB). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A2000 12GB).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 draws 150W versus the RTX A2000 12GB's 70W — a 72.7% difference. The RTX A2000 12GB is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 500W (RTX A2000 12GB). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 70W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 167mm |
| Height | 112mm | 68mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.0 | 196.0+118% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1070 launched at $379 MSRP, while the RTX A2000 12GB launched at $449. The GeForce GTX 1070 costs 15.6% less ($70 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.6 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 30.6 (RTX A2000 12GB) — the GeForce GTX 1070 offers 16.3% better value. The RTX A2000 12GB is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | RTX A2000 12GB |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379-16% | $449 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.6+16% | 30.6 |
| Codename | GP104 | GA106 |
| Release | June 10 2016 | November 23 2021 |
| Ranking | #185 | #177 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













