
Radeon Pro W5700
Popular choices:

RadeonT RX 6850M XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro W5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 28.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RadeonT RX 6850M XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RadeonT RX 6850M XT is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌24.2% higher power demand at 205W vs 165W.
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅41.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 205W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌25.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Radeon Pro W5700
2019RadeonT RX 6850M XT
2022Why buy it
- ✅Costs $201 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 28.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 14.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $1,000 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅41.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅50% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (12 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 165W instead of 205W, a 40W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RadeonT RX 6850M XT across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 12 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RadeonT RX 6850M XT is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌24.2% higher power demand at 205W vs 165W.
Trade-offs
- ❌25.2% HIGHER MSRP$1,000 MSRPvs$799 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 14.0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($1,000 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RadeonT RX 6850M XT better than Radeon Pro W5700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro W5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 179 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 159 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 145 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 122 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 145 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 117 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 97 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 60 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 52 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 365 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 243 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 281 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 195 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 162 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 126 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 69 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 431 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 157 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 504 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 420 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 315 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 315 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 315 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 252 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 210 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 157 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5700 and RadeonT RX 6850M XT

Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon Pro W5700
The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.

RadeonT RX 6850M XT
RadeonT RX 6850M XT
The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2022. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2321 MHz to 2581 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 165W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,992 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5700 scores 14,380 and the RadeonT RX 6850M XT reaches 13,992 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 2,560 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Raw compute: 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 13.21 TFLOPS (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Boost clocks: 1930 MHz vs 2581 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,380+3% | 13,992 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2560+11% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.893 TFLOPS | 13.21 TFLOPS+49% |
| Boost Clock | 1930 MHz | 2581 MHz+34% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 160+11% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro W5700 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT has 12 GB. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT offers 50% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 3 MB (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) — the Radeon Pro W5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 12 GB+50% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+33% | 3 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 12.2 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 1.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+500% | 1 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs VCN 3.0 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5700 draws 205W versus the RadeonT RX 6850M XT's 165W — a 21.6% difference. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 500W (RadeonT RX 6850M XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 205W | 165W-20% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 70.1 | 84.8+21% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro W5700 launched at $799 MSRP, while the RadeonT RX 6850M XT launched at $1000. The Radeon Pro W5700 costs 20.1% less ($201 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 14.0 (RadeonT RX 6850M XT) — the Radeon Pro W5700 offers 28.6% better value. The RadeonT RX 6850M XT is the newer GPU (2022 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RadeonT RX 6850M XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799-20% | $1000 |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.0+29% | 14.0 |
| Codename | Navi 10 | Navi 22 |
| Release | November 19 2019 | January 4 2022 |
| Ranking | #163 | #103 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













