
Radeon Pro W5700
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro W5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 5700 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌110.8% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
Radeon RX 5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅5.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $420 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 109.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.7 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro W5700
2019Radeon RX 5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅5.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $420 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 109.6% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 37.7 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 5700 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 5700 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌110.8% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 37.7 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 5700 better than Radeon Pro W5700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro W5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 149 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 115 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 98 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 129 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 76 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 64 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 49 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 262 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 220 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 112 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 133 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 100 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 75 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 87 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 73 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 58 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 42 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 643 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 515 FPS |
| high | 431 FPS | 429 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 482 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 386 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 322 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 241 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 322 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 257 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 214 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 161 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 427 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 255 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 237 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 197 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 193 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 155 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 140 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 115 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5700 and Radeon RX 5700

Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon Pro W5700
The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX 5700
Radeon RX 5700
The Radeon RX 5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in July 7 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1465 MHz to 1725 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,296 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5700 scores 14,380 and the Radeon RX 5700 reaches 14,296 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon RX 5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 2,304 (Radeon RX 5700). Raw compute: 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 7.949 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 5700). Boost clocks: 1930 MHz vs 1725 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,380 | 14,296 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2304 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.893 TFLOPS+12% | 7.949 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1930 MHz+12% | 1725 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 144 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + limited Frame Generation |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 5700 is support for FSR Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro W5700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 12.0 (Radeon RX 5700). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon RX 5700). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX 5700).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5700 draws 205W versus the Radeon RX 5700's 180W — a 13% difference. The Radeon RX 5700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 600W (Radeon RX 5700). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 6-pin + 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 270mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 205W | 180W-12% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 6-pin + 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 270mm |
| Height | 111mm | 110mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 70.1 | 79.4+13% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro W5700 launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 5700 launched at $379. The Radeon RX 5700 costs 52.6% less ($420 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 37.7 (Radeon RX 5700) — the Radeon RX 5700 offers 109.4% better value.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $379-53% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.0 | 37.7+109% |
| Codename | Navi 10 | Navi 10 |
| Release | November 19 2019 | July 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #163 | #167 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













