
Radeon Pro W5700
Popular choices:

RTX A4000 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro W5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX A4000 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌78.3% higher power demand at 205W vs 115W.
RTX A4000 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅40.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 205W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Radeon Pro W5700
2019RTX A4000 Mobile
2021Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅40.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: Ampere on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 115W instead of 205W, a 90W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX A4000 Mobile across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX A4000 Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌78.3% higher power demand at 205W vs 115W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX A4000 Mobile better than Radeon Pro W5700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro W5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 97 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 48 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 41 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 30 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 25 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 351 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 303 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 252 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 214 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 251 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 210 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 180 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 150 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 108 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 71 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 665 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 532 FPS |
| high | 431 FPS | 443 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 333 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 499 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 399 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 333 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 249 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 333 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 222 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 166 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 292 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 255 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 211 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 179 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 223 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 201 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 166 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 138 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 132 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 113 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 71 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5700 and RTX A4000 Mobile

Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon Pro W5700
The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.

RTX A4000 Mobile
RTX A4000 Mobile
The RTX A4000 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in April 12 2021. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1140 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 5120 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 115W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 40 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,782 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5700 scores 14,380 and the RTX A4000 Mobile reaches 14,782 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RTX A4000 Mobile uses Ampere, both on 7 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 5,120 (RTX A4000 Mobile). Raw compute: 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 17.2 TFLOPS (RTX A4000 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1930 MHz vs 1680 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,380 | 14,782+3% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Ampere |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 5120+122% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.893 TFLOPS | 17.2 TFLOPS+93% |
| Boost Clock | 1930 MHz+15% | 1680 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 144 | 160+11% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX A4000 Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | Upscaling support |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 12.2 (RTX A4000 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.2. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.2+9% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 7th Gen NVENC (RTX A4000 Mobile). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) (RTX A4000 Mobile).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | 7th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Decode) |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5700 draws 205W versus the RTX A4000 Mobile's 115W — a 56.3% difference. The RTX A4000 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 500W (RTX A4000 Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 205W | 115W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 70.1 | 128.5+83% |
Value Analysis
The RTX A4000 Mobile is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX A4000 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | — |
| Codename | Navi 10 | GA104 |
| Release | November 19 2019 | April 12 2021 |
| Ranking | #163 | #159 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













