
Radeon Pro W5700
Popular choices:

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro W5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌310% higher power demand at 205W vs 50W.
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2024Why buy it
- ✅24.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 205W, a 155W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Radeon Pro W5700
2019RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
2024Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅24.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 50W instead of 205W, a 155W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌310% higher power demand at 205W vs 50W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU better than Radeon Pro W5700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro W5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 143 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 128 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 112 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 92 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 125 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 105 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 90 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 77 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 73 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 48 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 42 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 342 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 217 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 169 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 180 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 109 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 90 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 77 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 59 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 672 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 537 FPS |
| high | 431 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 446 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 379 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 327 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 208 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 161 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 630 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 537 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 504 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 168 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5700 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon Pro W5700
The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,923 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5700 scores 14,380 and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU reaches 14,923 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1930 MHz vs 2130 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,380 | 14,923+4% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 2816+22% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.893 TFLOPS | 12 TFLOPS+35% |
| Boost Clock | 1930 MHz | 2130 MHz+10% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 144+64% | 88 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 12 MB+200% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5700 draws 205W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 50W — a 121.6% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 80°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 205W | 50W-76% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 80°C-6% |
| Perf/Watt | 70.1 | 298.5+326% |
Value Analysis
The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the newer GPU (2024 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | — |
| Codename | Navi 10 | AD107 |
| Release | November 19 2019 | February 12 2024 |
| Ranking | #163 | #107 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













