G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro W5700

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌310% higher power demand at 205W vs 50W.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅28.3% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 205W, a 155W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Radeon Pro W5700

2019

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

2023

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅28.3% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 205W, a 155W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌310% higher power demand at 205W vs 50W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile better than Radeon Pro W5700?

Yes. RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 28.3% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data, 3.7% higher PassMark G3D performance, and DLSS 2 Super Resolution. It also comes from 2023 instead of 2019, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2019, the stronger feature stack with DLSS Super Resolution instead of FSR upscaling, and a 5nm process instead of 7nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and you are getting 28.3% more estimated average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data and 3.7% higher G3D Mark. Radeon Pro W5700 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon Pro W5700 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

Is Radeon Pro W5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro W5700 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $799 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro W5700 Benchmark Check

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon Pro W5700	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	150 FPS	160 FPS
medium	132 FPS	146 FPS
high	113 FPS	129 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	109 FPS
1440p
low	127 FPS	132 FPS
medium	104 FPS	112 FPS
high	88 FPS	97 FPS
ultra	76 FPS	86 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	77 FPS
medium	62 FPS	67 FPS
high	47 FPS	50 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	43 FPS

Open Radeon Pro W5700 Open RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon Pro W5700	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	226 FPS	356 FPS
medium	190 FPS	300 FPS
high	138 FPS	242 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	187 FPS
1440p
low	146 FPS	221 FPS
medium	122 FPS	191 FPS
high	93 FPS	158 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	125 FPS
4K
low	78 FPS	109 FPS
medium	66 FPS	90 FPS
high	54 FPS	77 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	59 FPS

Open Radeon Pro W5700 Open RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon Pro W5700	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	647 FPS	671 FPS
medium	518 FPS	537 FPS
high	431 FPS	447 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	335 FPS
1440p
low	485 FPS	445 FPS
medium	388 FPS	377 FPS
high	324 FPS	319 FPS
ultra	243 FPS	252 FPS
4K
low	324 FPS	327 FPS
medium	259 FPS	268 FPS
high	216 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	162 FPS	161 FPS

Open Radeon Pro W5700 Open RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon Pro W5700	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
1080p
low	332 FPS	632 FPS
medium	284 FPS	537 FPS
high	235 FPS	447 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	335 FPS
1440p
low	275 FPS	503 FPS
medium	236 FPS	403 FPS
high	181 FPS	335 FPS
ultra	146 FPS	252 FPS
4K
low	147 FPS	324 FPS
medium	116 FPS	268 FPS
high	101 FPS	224 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	168 FPS

Open Radeon Pro W5700 Open RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5700 and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

Radeon Pro W5700

The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in March 21 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1635 MHz to 2115 MHz. It has 3072 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 24 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,909 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro W5700 scores 14,380 and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile reaches 14,909 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 3,072 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Raw compute: 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 12.99 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Boost clocks: 1930 MHz vs 2115 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
G3D Mark Score	14,380	14,909+4%
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	7 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	2304	3072+33%
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.893 TFLOPS	12.99 TFLOPS+46%
Boost Clock	1930 MHz	2115 MHz+10%
ROPs	64+33%	48
TMUs	144+50%	96
L2 Cache	4 MB	12 MB+200%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB	12 MB+200%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
DirectX	12.0	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	6+50%	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs NVENC (Ada) (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs NVDEC (Ada). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile).

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
Encoder	VCN 2.0	NVENC (Ada)
Decoder	VCN 2.0	NVDEC (Ada)
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9	H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro W5700 draws 205W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile's 50W — a 121.6% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Mobile
TDP	205W	50W-76%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	0mm
Height	111mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	85°C	85
Perf/Watt	70.1	298.2+325%