G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro W5700

2019

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌192.9% higher power demand at 205W vs 70W.
❌59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

2025

Why buy it

✅44.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 70W instead of 205W, a 135W reduction.
✅Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌
6.3% HIGHER MSRP
$849 MSRPvs$799 MSRP

Radeon Pro W5700

2019

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

2025

Why buy it

✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($799 MSRP vs $849 MSRP).

Why buy it

✅44.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
✅More future proof: Blackwell 2.0 on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 70W instead of 205W, a 135W reduction.
✅Measures 167mm instead of 267mm, a 100mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
❌Weaker long-term outlook: RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌192.9% higher power demand at 205W vs 70W.
❌59.9% longer card at 267mm vs 167mm.

Trade-offs

❌
6.3% HIGHER MSRP
$849 MSRPvs$799 MSRP

Quick Answers

So, is RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell better than Radeon Pro W5700?

Yes. RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 44.7% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data, 0.1% higher PassMark G3D performance, and 16 GB vs 8 GB of VRAM. It also comes from 2025 instead of 2019, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2025 generation instead of 2019, more VRAM at 16 GB instead of 8 GB, the stronger feature stack with no meaningful modern upscaling stack instead of FSR upscaling, and a 5nm process instead of 7nm. That extra memory headroom makes it the safer pick for newer games, heavier textures, and higher settings over time.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon Pro W5700 is easier to justify on price alone at $799 MSRP, but RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is still the stronger gaming card overall. RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is about 6.3% more expensive on MSRP at $849 MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and you are getting 44.7% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (14,363 vs 14,380). Radeon Pro W5700 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. Go with RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell if you want the better experience; go with Radeon Pro W5700 if keeping cost down matters more than squeezing out the highest performance.

Is Radeon Pro W5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro W5700 is still a very good gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. Around $799 MSRP, it makes sense if you would rather save money than pay about 6.3% more for the extra performance. If you have more room in the budget, RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is still the safer long-term pick.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro W5700 Benchmark Check

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon Pro W5700	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
1080p
low	150 FPS	181 FPS
medium	132 FPS	160 FPS
high	113 FPS	135 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	99 FPS
1440p
low	127 FPS	158 FPS
medium	104 FPS	133 FPS
high	88 FPS	99 FPS
ultra	76 FPS	72 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	80 FPS
medium	62 FPS	68 FPS
high	47 FPS	49 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	44 FPS

Open Radeon Pro W5700 Open RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon Pro W5700	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
1080p
low	226 FPS	294 FPS
medium	190 FPS	255 FPS
high	138 FPS	211 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	170 FPS
1440p
low	146 FPS	212 FPS
medium	122 FPS	181 FPS
high	93 FPS	152 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	121 FPS
4K
low	78 FPS	99 FPS
medium	66 FPS	83 FPS
high	54 FPS	70 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	52 FPS

Open Radeon Pro W5700 Open RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon Pro W5700	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
1080p
low	647 FPS	646 FPS
medium	518 FPS	517 FPS
high	431 FPS	431 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	323 FPS
1440p
low	485 FPS	485 FPS
medium	388 FPS	388 FPS
high	324 FPS	323 FPS
ultra	243 FPS	242 FPS
4K
low	324 FPS	323 FPS
medium	259 FPS	259 FPS
high	216 FPS	215 FPS
ultra	162 FPS	162 FPS

Open Radeon Pro W5700 Open RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon Pro W5700	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
1080p
low	332 FPS	290 FPS
medium	284 FPS	247 FPS
high	235 FPS	203 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	177 FPS
1440p
low	275 FPS	229 FPS
medium	236 FPS	198 FPS
high	181 FPS	165 FPS
ultra	146 FPS	139 FPS
4K
low	147 FPS	139 FPS
medium	116 FPS	116 FPS
high	101 FPS	93 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	76 FPS

Open Radeon Pro W5700 Open RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5700 and RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

Radeon Pro W5700

The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.

RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in August 11 2025. It features the Blackwell 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 982 MHz to 1957 MHz. It has 4352 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 34 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,363 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro W5700 scores 14,380 and the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell reaches 14,363 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell uses Blackwell 2.0, both on 7 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 4,352 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Raw compute: 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 17.03 TFLOPS (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Boost clocks: 1930 MHz vs 1957 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
G3D Mark Score	14,380	14,363
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	Blackwell 2.0
Process Node	7 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	2304	4352+89%
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.893 TFLOPS	17.03 TFLOPS+91%
Boost Clock	1930 MHz	1957 MHz+1%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	144+6%	136
L2 Cache	4 MB	32 MB+700%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	Upscaling support
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro W5700 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has 16 GB. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 32 MB (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	16 GB+100%
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	256-bit+100%
L2 Cache	4 MB	32 MB+700%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 12.0 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
DirectX	12.0	12.0
Vulkan	1.1	1.4+27%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	6+50%	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 9th Gen NVENC (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs 6th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell).

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
Encoder	VCN 2.0	9th Gen NVENC
Decoder	VCN 2.0	6th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro W5700 draws 205W versus the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell's 70W — a 98.2% difference. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 500W (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 167mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 70°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell
TDP	205W	70W-66%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	167mm
Height	111mm	68mm
Slots	2	2
Temp (Load)	85°C	70°C-18%
Perf/Watt	70.1	205.2+193%

💰

Value Analysis

The Radeon Pro W5700 launched at $799 MSRP, while the RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell launched at $849. The Radeon Pro W5700 costs 5.9% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 16.9 (RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell) — the Radeon Pro W5700 offers 6.5% better value. The RTX PRO 2000 Blackwell is the newer GPU (2025 vs 2019).