
GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro W5700
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅13.2% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 124.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 205W, a 45W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro W5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌128.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌28.1% higher power demand at 205W vs 160W.
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Radeon Pro W5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅13.2% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $450 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 124.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅Draws 160W instead of 205W, a 45W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 (2025) instead.
- ❌128.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
- ❌28.1% higher power demand at 205W vs 160W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than Radeon Pro W5700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon Pro W5700 make more sense than GeForce RTX 2060?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 150 FPS |
| medium | 98 FPS | 132 FPS |
| high | 82 FPS | 113 FPS |
| ultra | 69 FPS | 95 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 95 FPS | 127 FPS |
| medium | 83 FPS | 104 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 88 FPS |
| ultra | 60 FPS | 76 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 47 FPS | 74 FPS |
| medium | 43 FPS | 62 FPS |
| high | 31 FPS | 47 FPS |
| ultra | 27 FPS | 41 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 290 FPS | 226 FPS |
| medium | 247 FPS | 190 FPS |
| high | 197 FPS | 138 FPS |
| ultra | 155 FPS | 99 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 192 FPS | 146 FPS |
| medium | 164 FPS | 122 FPS |
| high | 131 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 67 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 108 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 91 FPS | 66 FPS |
| high | 75 FPS | 54 FPS |
| ultra | 57 FPS | 39 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 635 FPS | 647 FPS |
| medium | 508 FPS | 518 FPS |
| high | 423 FPS | 431 FPS |
| ultra | 318 FPS | 324 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 476 FPS | 485 FPS |
| medium | 381 FPS | 388 FPS |
| high | 318 FPS | 324 FPS |
| ultra | 238 FPS | 243 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 318 FPS | 324 FPS |
| medium | 254 FPS | 259 FPS |
| high | 212 FPS | 216 FPS |
| ultra | 159 FPS | 162 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 428 FPS | 332 FPS |
| medium | 354 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 286 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 357 FPS | 275 FPS |
| medium | 302 FPS | 236 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 181 FPS |
| ultra | 193 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 204 FPS | 147 FPS |
| medium | 166 FPS | 116 FPS |
| high | 154 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 119 FPS | 84 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce RTX 2060 and Radeon Pro W5700

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.

Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon Pro W5700
The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce RTX 2060 scores 14,114 and the Radeon Pro W5700 reaches 14,380 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.9% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce RTX 2060 is built on Turing while the Radeon Pro W5700 uses RDNA 1.0, both on 12 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700). Raw compute: 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700). Boost clocks: 1680 MHz vs 1930 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,114 | 14,380+2% |
| Architecture | Turing | RDNA 1.0 |
| Process Node | 12 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 2304+20% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.451 TFLOPS | 8.893 TFLOPS+38% |
| Boost Clock | 1680 MHz | 1930 MHz+15% |
| ROPs | 48 | 64+33% |
| TMUs | 120 | 144+20% |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro W5700 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | DLSS 2 Super Resolution | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce RTX 2060 comes with 6 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro W5700 has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro W5700 offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 192-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) — the Radeon Pro W5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 6 GB | 8 GB+33% |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 192-bit+50% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 3 MB | 4 MB+33% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 Ultimate (12_2) | 12.0 |
| Vulkan | 1.3+18% | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060) vs VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700). Decoder: NVDEC (Turing) vs VCN 2.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700).
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC (Turing) | VCN 2.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC (Turing) | VCN 2.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce RTX 2060 draws 160W versus the Radeon Pro W5700's 205W — a 24.7% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 500W (Radeon Pro W5700). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 229mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 72 vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 160W-22% | 205W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 229mm | 267mm |
| Height | 113mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 72-15% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 88.2+26% | 70.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro W5700 launched at $799. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 56.3% less ($450 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) vs 18.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 124.4% better value.
| Feature | GeForce RTX 2060 | Radeon Pro W5700 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $349-56% | $799 |
| Performance per Dollar | 40.4+124% | 18.0 |
| Codename | TU106 | Navi 10 |
| Release | January 7 2019 | November 19 2019 |
| Ranking | #168 | #163 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













