
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 2060
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
2017Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌14.3% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 36.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅1.1% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
2017GeForce RTX 2060
2019Why buy it
- ✅33.3% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (8 GB vs 6 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅1.1% more average FPS across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($349 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 10% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 40.4 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($349 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Turing (2018−2022) on 12nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 2060 across 47 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌14.3% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$349 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 36.8 vs 40.4 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $349 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 6 GB vs 8 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 2060 better than GeForce GTX 1070 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1070 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 98 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 82 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 69 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 95 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 60 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 47 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 43 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 31 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 27 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 247 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 197 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 155 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 192 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 164 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 131 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 104 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 108 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 91 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 635 FPS |
| medium | 528 FPS | 508 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 423 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 318 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 495 FPS | 476 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 381 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 318 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 238 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 318 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 254 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 212 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 159 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 403 FPS | 428 FPS |
| medium | 342 FPS | 354 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 286 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 244 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 357 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 302 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 235 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 193 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 204 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 154 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 119 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and GeForce RTX 2060

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 2432 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,673 points. Launch price was $399.

GeForce RTX 2060
GeForce RTX 2060
The GeForce RTX 2060 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 7 2019. It features the Turing architecture. The core clock ranges from 1365 MHz to 1680 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 160W. Manufactured using 12 nm process technology. It features 30 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,114 points. Launch price was $349.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti scores 14,673 and the GeForce RTX 2060 reaches 14,114 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 2060 uses Turing, both on 16 nm vs 12 nm. Shader units: 2,432 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 1,920 (GeForce RTX 2060). Raw compute: 8.186 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 6.451 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 2060). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 1680 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,673+4% | 14,114 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Turing |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 12 nm |
| Shading Units | 2432+27% | 1920 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.186 TFLOPS+27% | 6.451 TFLOPS |
| Boost Clock | 1683 MHz | 1680 MHz |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 152+27% | 120 |
| L1 Cache | 0.89 MB | 1.9 MB+113% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 2060 supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the GeForce RTX 2060 has 6 GB. The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti offers 33.3% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 336 GB/s (GeForce RTX 2060) — a 31.3% advantage for the GeForce RTX 2060. Bus width: 256-bit vs 192-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 3 MB (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB+33% | 6 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 336 GB/s+31% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+33% | 192-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 3 MB+50% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 2060). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs NVENC (Turing) (GeForce RTX 2060). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs NVDEC (Turing). Supported codecs: H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce RTX 2060).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | NVENC (Turing) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | NVDEC (Turing) |
| Codecs | H.265,H.264,VP9 | H.264,H.265,VP9,VP8,MPEG-2,VC-1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti draws 180W versus the GeForce RTX 2060's 160W — a 11.8% difference. The GeForce RTX 2060 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 2060). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 229mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 72.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 160W-11% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 229mm |
| Height | 112mm | 113mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 72-4% |
| Perf/Watt | 81.5 | 88.2+8% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 2060 launched at $349. The GeForce RTX 2060 costs 12.5% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 36.8 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 40.4 (GeForce RTX 2060) — the GeForce RTX 2060 offers 9.8% better value. The GeForce RTX 2060 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | GeForce RTX 2060 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $349-13% |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.8 | 40.4+10% |
| Codename | GP104 | TU106 |
| Release | November 2 2017 | January 7 2019 |
| Ranking | #161 | #168 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












