G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

2017

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

2024

Why buy it

✅10.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 36.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

2017

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

2024

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅10.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 50W instead of 180W, a 130W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
❌260% higher power demand at 180W vs 50W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 36.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $399 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU better than GeForce GTX 1070 Ti?

Yes. RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is clearly the better overall GPU here. RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU averages 10.0% more FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data. You are also looking at 14,923 vs 14,673 in G3D Mark. On top of that, RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is a 2024 card with DLSS Super Resolution, while GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is a 2017 model from an older generation with no meaningful modern upscaling stack. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2024 generation instead of 2017, better upscaling support with DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020) instead of no meaningful modern upscaling stack, and a 5nm process instead of 16nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is the smarter buy by a wide margin. RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $399 MSRP, and you are getting 10.0% more estimated average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data and 1.7% higher G3D Mark. GeForce GTX 1070 Ti really only makes sense now as a very cheap stopgap or a used-market placeholder.

Is GeForce GTX 1070 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

No, not for a fresh gaming build. GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is 2017 hardware with 8 GB of VRAM, 14,673 in G3D Mark, and no meaningful modern upscaling stack. That is simply too far behind to be an easy modern recommendation.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Benchmark Check

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1070 Ti	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
1080p
low	153 FPS	143 FPS
medium	135 FPS	128 FPS
high	120 FPS	112 FPS
ultra	101 FPS	92 FPS
1440p
low	131 FPS	125 FPS
medium	106 FPS	105 FPS
high	94 FPS	90 FPS
ultra	85 FPS	77 FPS
4K
low	77 FPS	73 FPS
medium	65 FPS	65 FPS
high	52 FPS	48 FPS
ultra	45 FPS	42 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Open RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	GeForce GTX 1070 Ti	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
1080p
low	219 FPS	342 FPS
medium	183 FPS	284 FPS
high	150 FPS	217 FPS
ultra	114 FPS	169 FPS
1440p
low	134 FPS	212 FPS
medium	107 FPS	180 FPS
high	87 FPS	150 FPS
ultra	68 FPS	119 FPS
4K
low	62 FPS	109 FPS
medium	51 FPS	90 FPS
high	49 FPS	77 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	59 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Open RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	GeForce GTX 1070 Ti	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
1080p
low	660 FPS	672 FPS
medium	528 FPS	537 FPS
high	440 FPS	448 FPS
ultra	330 FPS	336 FPS
1440p
low	495 FPS	446 FPS
medium	396 FPS	379 FPS
high	330 FPS	321 FPS
ultra	248 FPS	252 FPS
4K
low	330 FPS	327 FPS
medium	264 FPS	269 FPS
high	220 FPS	208 FPS
ultra	165 FPS	161 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Open RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	GeForce GTX 1070 Ti	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
1080p
low	403 FPS	630 FPS
medium	342 FPS	537 FPS
high	288 FPS	448 FPS
ultra	244 FPS	336 FPS
1440p
low	331 FPS	504 FPS
medium	279 FPS	403 FPS
high	222 FPS	336 FPS
ultra	182 FPS	252 FPS
4K
low	178 FPS	317 FPS
medium	140 FPS	269 FPS
high	128 FPS	224 FPS
ultra	105 FPS	168 FPS

Open GeForce GTX 1070 Ti Open RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti

The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 2432 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,673 points. Launch price was $399.

RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in February 12 2024. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1620 MHz to 2130 MHz. It has 2816 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 22 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,923 points. Launch price was $649.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti scores 14,673 and the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU reaches 14,923 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is built on Pascal while the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU uses Ada Lovelace, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,432 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 2,816 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Raw compute: 8.186 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 12 TFLOPS (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 2130 MHz.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1070 Ti	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
G3D Mark Score	14,673	14,923+2%
Architecture	Pascal	Ada Lovelace
Process Node	16 nm	5 nm
Shading Units	2432	2816+16%
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.186 TFLOPS	12 TFLOPS+47%
Boost Clock	1683 MHz	2130 MHz+27%
ROPs	64+33%	48
TMUs	152+73%	88
L1 Cache	0.89 MB	2.8 MB+215%
L2 Cache	2 MB	12 MB+500%

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1070 Ti	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Upscaling Tech	Upscaling support	DLSS 2 Super Resolution
Frame Generation	Not Supported	Not Supported
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	NVIDIA Reflex	NVIDIA Reflex

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 12 MB (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU) — the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1070 Ti	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR5	GDDR6
Memory Bandwidth	256 GB/s	256 GB/s
Bus Width	256-bit+100%	128-bit
L2 Cache	2 MB	12 MB+500%

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 12.2 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1070 Ti	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
DirectX	12	12.2+2%
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	4	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU).

Feature	GeForce GTX 1070 Ti	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
Encoder	NVENC 6th Gen	8th Gen NVENC
Decoder	NVDEC 3rd Gen	5th Gen NVDEC
Codecs	H.265,H.264,VP9	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti draws 180W versus the RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU's 50W — a 113% difference. The RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 500W (RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.

Feature	GeForce GTX 1070 Ti	RTX 2000 Ada Generation Laptop GPU
TDP	180W	50W-72%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	8-pin	PCIe-powered
Length	267mm	0mm
Height	112mm	0mm
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	75-6%	80°C
Perf/Watt	81.5	298.5+266%