
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
2017Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌33% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 36.8 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅2.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 29.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
2017GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
2023Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅2.0% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $99 less on MSRP ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 29.9% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 47.8 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($300 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ✅More future proof: Ada Lovelace (2022−2024) on 5nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation (2023).
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌33% HIGHER MSRP$399 MSRPvs$300 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 36.8 vs 47.8 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $300 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile better than GeForce GTX 1070 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1070 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 120 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 105 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 86 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 120 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 84 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 72 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 67 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 59 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 42 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 36 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 296 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 245 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 188 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 145 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 198 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 166 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 137 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 105 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 87 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 58 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 645 FPS |
| medium | 528 FPS | 516 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 430 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 495 FPS | 442 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 373 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 316 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 258 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 200 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 153 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 403 FPS | 484 FPS |
| medium | 342 FPS | 424 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 360 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 322 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 402 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 351 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 285 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 242 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 240 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 203 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 185 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 159 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 2432 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,673 points. Launch price was $399.

GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile
The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in January 3 2023. It features the Ada Lovelace architecture. The core clock ranges from 1455 MHz to 1755 MHz. It has 2560 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 50W. Manufactured using 5 nm process technology. It features 20 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,332 points.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti scores 14,673 and the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile reaches 14,332 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2.4% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile uses Ada Lovelace, both on 16 nm vs 5 nm. Shader units: 2,432 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 2,560 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Raw compute: 8.186 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 8.986 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 1755 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,673+2% | 14,332 |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ada Lovelace |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 5 nm |
| Shading Units | 2432 | 2560+5% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.186 TFLOPS | 8.986 TFLOPS+10% |
| Boost Clock | 1683 MHz | 1755 MHz+4% |
| ROPs | 64+33% | 48 |
| TMUs | 152+90% | 80 |
| L1 Cache | 0.89 MB | 2.5 MB+181% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is support for DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile supports the newer DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 3.5 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | DLSS 3.5 + Frame Generation |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | Yes (DLSS 3.5) |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 192 GB/s (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) — a 33.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 96-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 12 MB (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s+33% | 192 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+167% | 96-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 12 MB+500% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 12.2 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 8th Gen NVENC (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs 5th Gen NVDEC. Supported codecs: H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | 8th Gen NVENC |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | 5th Gen NVDEC |
| Codecs | H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti draws 180W versus the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile's 50W — a 113% difference. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 500W (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile). Power connectors: 8-pin vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 80°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 50W-72% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 112mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 75-6% | 80°C |
| Perf/Watt | 81.5 | 286.6+252% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile launched at $300. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile costs 24.8% less ($99 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 36.8 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 47.8 (GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile) — the GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile offers 29.9% better value. The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399 | $300-25% |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.8 | 47.8+30% |
| Codename | GP104 | AD107 |
| Release | November 2 2017 | January 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #161 | #166 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












