
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
2017Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 59.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 23.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.
- ❌40.5% longer card at 267mm vs 190mm.
Radeon PRO W6600
2021Why buy it
- ✅13.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 190mm instead of 267mm, a 77mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌62.7% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.0 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
2017Radeon PRO W6600
2021Why buy it
- ✅Costs $250 less on MSRP ($399 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 59.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 36.8 vs 23.0 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅13.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 180W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 190mm instead of 267mm, a 77mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌80% higher power demand at 180W vs 100W.
- ❌40.5% longer card at 267mm vs 190mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌62.7% HIGHER MSRP$649 MSRPvs$399 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 23.0 vs 36.8 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W6600 better than GeForce GTX 1070 Ti?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1070 Ti still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 153 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 135 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 120 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 101 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 131 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 94 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 85 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 77 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 65 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 52 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 45 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 219 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 183 FPS | 313 FPS |
| high | 150 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 114 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 134 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 107 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 87 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 68 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 62 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 49 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 60 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 660 FPS | 666 FPS |
| medium | 528 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 440 FPS | 445 FPS |
| ultra | 330 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 495 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 396 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 330 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 248 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 330 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 264 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 220 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 165 FPS | 168 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 403 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 342 FPS | 518 FPS |
| high | 288 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 244 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 331 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 222 FPS | 325 FPS |
| ultra | 182 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 178 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 140 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 128 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 105 FPS | 168 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 Ti and Radeon PRO W6600

GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
GeForce GTX 1070 Ti
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in November 2 2017. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1607 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 2432 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 180W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,673 points. Launch price was $399.

Radeon PRO W6600
Radeon PRO W6600
The Radeon PRO W6600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2903 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,932 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti scores 14,673 and the Radeon PRO W6600 reaches 14,932 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti is built on Pascal while the Radeon PRO W6600 uses RDNA 2.0, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 2,432 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600). Raw compute: 8.186 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 10.4 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 2903 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,673 | 14,932+2% |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2432+36% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.186 TFLOPS | 10.4 TFLOPS+27% |
| Boost Clock | 1683 MHz | 2903 MHz+72% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 152+36% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 912 KB+78% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W6600 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 224 GB/s (Radeon PRO W6600) — a 14.3% advantage for the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s+14% | 224 GB/s |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 3.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.4+8% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4+33% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th Gen (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd Gen vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.265,H.264,VP9 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6600).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th Gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd Gen | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.265,H.264,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti draws 180W versus the Radeon PRO W6600's 100W — a 57.1% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 190mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75 vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 180W | 100W-44% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 190mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75 | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 81.5 | 149.3+83% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti launched at $399 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6600 launched at $649. The GeForce GTX 1070 Ti costs 38.5% less ($250 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 36.8 (GeForce GTX 1070 Ti) vs 23.0 (Radeon PRO W6600) — the GeForce GTX 1070 Ti offers 60% better value. The Radeon PRO W6600 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2017).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 Ti | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $399-39% | $649 |
| Performance per Dollar | 36.8+60% | 23.0 |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 23 |
| Release | November 2 2017 | June 8 2021 |
| Ranking | #161 | #153 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.












