
Radeon Pro W5700
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W6600
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro W5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W6600 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌23.1% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 23.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ❌105% higher power demand at 205W vs 100W.
Radeon PRO W6600
2021Why buy it
- ✅27.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 205W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro W5700
2019Radeon PRO W6600
2021Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅27.5% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $150 less on MSRP ($649 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 27.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 23.0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($649 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 205W, a 105W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W6600 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon PRO W6600 is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌23.1% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$649 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 23.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $649 MSRP).
- ❌105% higher power demand at 205W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W6600 better than Radeon Pro W5700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro W5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 172 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 151 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 134 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 113 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 140 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 101 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 91 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 84 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 71 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 59 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 51 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 387 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 313 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 239 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 185 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 231 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 191 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 150 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 113 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 93 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 78 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 60 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 666 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 431 FPS | 445 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 403 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 336 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 336 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 269 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 168 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 623 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 518 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 448 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 336 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 472 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 387 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 325 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 252 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 268 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 168 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5700 and Radeon PRO W6600

Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon Pro W5700
The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon PRO W6600
Radeon PRO W6600
The Radeon PRO W6600 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in June 8 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2331 MHz to 2903 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,932 points. Launch price was $649.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5700 scores 14,380 and the Radeon PRO W6600 reaches 14,932 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon PRO W6600 uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W6600). Raw compute: 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 10.4 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W6600). Boost clocks: 1930 MHz vs 2903 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,380 | 14,932+4% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 2.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+29% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.893 TFLOPS | 10.4 TFLOPS+17% |
| Boost Clock | 1930 MHz | 2903 MHz+50% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144+29% | 112 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling + RSR |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 2 MB (Radeon PRO W6600) — the Radeon Pro W5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 256-bit+100% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W6600). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.4. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 3.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.2+2% |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.4+27% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+100% | 3 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon PRO W6600). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon PRO W6600).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 3.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5700 draws 205W versus the Radeon PRO W6600's 100W — a 68.9% difference. The Radeon PRO W6600 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W6600). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 190mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 205W | 100W-51% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 190mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 75°C-12% |
| Perf/Watt | 70.1 | 149.3+113% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro W5700 launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W6600 launched at $649. The Radeon PRO W6600 costs 18.8% less ($150 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 23.0 (Radeon PRO W6600) — the Radeon PRO W6600 offers 27.8% better value. The Radeon PRO W6600 is the newer GPU (2021 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon PRO W6600 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $649-19% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.0 | 23.0+28% |
| Codename | Navi 10 | Navi 23 |
| Release | November 19 2019 | June 8 2021 |
| Ranking | #163 | #153 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













