
Radeon Pro W5700
Popular choices:

Radeon RX Vega 64
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro W5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 295W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 64 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌60.1% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Radeon RX Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅20.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 55.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌43.9% higher power demand at 295W vs 205W.
Radeon Pro W5700
2019Radeon RX Vega 64
2017Why buy it
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 205W instead of 295W, a 90W reduction.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Why buy it
- ✅20.6% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $300 less on MSRP ($499 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 55.3% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 28.0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($499 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX Vega 64 across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌60.1% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$499 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 28.0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $499 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2017-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌43.9% higher power demand at 295W vs 205W.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro W5700 better than Radeon RX Vega 64?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon RX Vega 64 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 141 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 126 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 108 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 90 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 100 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 83 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 71 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 68 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 57 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 43 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 37 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 317 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 187 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 128 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 103 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 88 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 73 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 628 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 502 FPS |
| high | 431 FPS | 418 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 314 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 471 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 377 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 314 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 235 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 251 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 209 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 157 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 391 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 347 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 295 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 236 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 314 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 228 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 181 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 200 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 188 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 127 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5700 and Radeon RX Vega 64

Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon Pro W5700
The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX Vega 64
Radeon RX Vega 64
The Radeon RX Vega 64 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 7 2017. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1247 MHz to 1546 MHz. It has 4096 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 295W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,949 points. Launch price was $499.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5700 scores 14,380 and the Radeon RX Vega 64 reaches 13,949 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.1% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon RX Vega 64 uses GCN 5.0, both on 7 nm vs 14 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 4,096 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Raw compute: 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 12.66 TFLOPS (Radeon RX Vega 64). Boost clocks: 1930 MHz vs 1546 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,380+3% | 13,949 |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | GCN 5.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 14 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304 | 4096+78% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.893 TFLOPS | 12.66 TFLOPS+42% |
| Boost Clock | 1930 MHz+25% | 1546 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144 | 256+78% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR upscaling |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Bus width: 128-bit vs 2048-bit.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | HBM2 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 2048-bit+1500% |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB | 4 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 12.1 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.1. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.1 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs VCE 4.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs UVD 7.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon RX Vega 64).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCE 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | UVD 7.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5700 draws 205W versus the Radeon RX Vega 64's 295W — a 36% difference. The Radeon Pro W5700 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 750W (Radeon RX Vega 64). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs 2x 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 267mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 205W-31% | 295W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-33% | 750W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | 2x 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 267mm |
| Height | 111mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 70.1+48% | 47.3 |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro W5700 launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon RX Vega 64 launched at $499. The Radeon RX Vega 64 costs 37.5% less ($300 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 28.0 (Radeon RX Vega 64) — the Radeon RX Vega 64 offers 55.6% better value. The Radeon Pro W5700 is the newer GPU (2019 vs 2017).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX Vega 64 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $499-38% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.0 | 28.0+56% |
| Codename | Navi 10 | Vega 10 |
| Release | November 19 2019 | August 7 2017 |
| Ranking | #163 | #171 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













