
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7700S
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
2018Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 34.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 300W vs 100W.
Radeon RX 7700S
2023Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 34.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 300W, a 200W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
2018Radeon RX 7700S
2023Why buy it
- ✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).
Why buy it
- ✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 34.6 vs 0 G3D/$ ($449 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 100W instead of 300W, a 200W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 34.6 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $449 MSRP).
- ❌200% higher power demand at 300W vs 100W.
Trade-offs
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU better than Radeon RX 7700S?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
When does Radeon RX 7700S make more sense than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 211 FPS | 165 FPS |
| medium | 191 FPS | 146 FPS |
| high | 160 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 106 FPS | 109 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 183 FPS | 138 FPS |
| medium | 158 FPS | 112 FPS |
| high | 115 FPS | 99 FPS |
| ultra | 75 FPS | 89 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 76 FPS | 83 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 70 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 55 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 48 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 301 FPS | 369 FPS |
| medium | 255 FPS | 313 FPS |
| high | 201 FPS | 243 FPS |
| ultra | 158 FPS | 196 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 203 FPS | 229 FPS |
| medium | 172 FPS | 195 FPS |
| high | 146 FPS | 155 FPS |
| ultra | 112 FPS | 125 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 99 FPS | 106 FPS |
| medium | 82 FPS | 89 FPS |
| high | 69 FPS | 72 FPS |
| ultra | 52 FPS | 55 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 703 FPS | 699 FPS |
| medium | 563 FPS | 559 FPS |
| high | 469 FPS | 466 FPS |
| ultra | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 528 FPS | 524 FPS |
| medium | 422 FPS | 419 FPS |
| high | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
| ultra | 264 FPS | 262 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 352 FPS | 349 FPS |
| medium | 281 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 234 FPS | 233 FPS |
| ultra | 176 FPS | 175 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 321 FPS | 600 FPS |
| medium | 279 FPS | 512 FPS |
| high | 243 FPS | 440 FPS |
| ultra | 183 FPS | 349 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 237 FPS | 463 FPS |
| medium | 212 FPS | 392 FPS |
| high | 185 FPS | 319 FPS |
| ultra | 137 FPS | 256 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 142 FPS | 290 FPS |
| medium | 125 FPS | 267 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 231 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 175 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU and Radeon RX 7700S

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.

Radeon RX 7700S
Radeon RX 7700S
The Radeon RX 7700S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2500 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,527 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU scores 15,633 and the Radeon RX 7700S reaches 15,527 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.7% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon RX 7700S uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7700S). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 20.48 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7700S). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 2500 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 15,633 | 15,527 |
| Architecture | GCN 5.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 14 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 3584 ×2+75% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 | 20.48 TFLOPS+91% |
| Boost Clock | 1500 MHz | 2500 MHz+67% |
| ROPs | 64 ×2 | 64 |
| TMUs | 224 ×2+75% | 128 |
| L1 Cache | 896 KB+75% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7700S is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7700S has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7700S) — the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 32 GB+300% | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 7700S). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.2+2% | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.3 | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 0 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7700S). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7700S).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 3.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 | H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU draws 300W versus the Radeon RX 7700S's 100W — a 100% difference. The Radeon RX 7700S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 650W (Radeon RX 7700S). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 300W | 100W-67% |
| Recommended PSU | 650W | 650W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | — |
| Height | 111mm | — |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | — |
| Perf/Watt | 52.1 | 155.3+198% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon RX 7700S is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2018).
| Feature | Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU | Radeon RX 7700S |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | — | $449 |
| Codename | Vega 10 | Navi 33 |
| Release | August 26 2018 | January 4 2023 |
| Ranking | #592 | #140 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













