G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

2018

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 57.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
❌300% higher power demand at 300W vs 75W.

Radeon RX 7600S

2023

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 57.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 75W instead of 300W, a 225W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

2018

Radeon RX 7600S

2023

Why buy it

✅300% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (32 GB vs 8 GB).

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 57.8 vs 0 G3D/$ ($269 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 75W instead of 300W, a 225W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Limited future-proofing: older hardware, 32 GB of VRAM, and weaker feature support mean it will age faster in upcoming AAA games.
❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 57.8 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $269 MSRP).
❌300% higher power demand at 300W vs 75W.

Trade-offs

❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 32 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU better than Radeon RX 7600S?

Yes. Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is clearly the better overall GPU here. You are also looking at 15,633 vs 15,553 in G3D Mark. On top of that, Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is a 2018 card with FSR upscaling, while Radeon RX 7600S is a 2023 model from an older generation with FSR 3 + AFMF. So this is not really a tight same-tier comparison. It is more a modern card against an older, weaker alternative.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 7600S is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2023 generation instead of 2018, better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of FSR upscaling, and a 6nm process instead of 14nm. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 7600S can still make sense if you find it at the right price, especially around $269 MSRP. Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is still the smarter buy for most people, though, because the raw performance is close while the overall package is cleaner. Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $269 MSRP, and you are getting 0.5% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 7600S is the newer 2023 card, so it still has a real case if you care more about newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 300W), and future-proofing than about squeezing out the strongest gaming value today.

When does Radeon RX 7600S make more sense than Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU?

Yes. Radeon RX 7600S is still an excellent gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. It makes more sense if your priority is newer architecture, lower power draw (75W vs 300W), future-proofing, and staying closer to $269 MSRP more than squeezing out the extra headroom of Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU. The trade-off is that Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU currently gives you 0.5% higher G3D Mark. Radeon RX 7600S still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 7600S Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon RX 7600S
1080p
low	211 FPS	164 FPS
medium	191 FPS	146 FPS
high	160 FPS	127 FPS
ultra	106 FPS	108 FPS
1440p
low	183 FPS	138 FPS
medium	158 FPS	112 FPS
high	115 FPS	98 FPS
ultra	75 FPS	89 FPS
4K
low	76 FPS	83 FPS
medium	66 FPS	70 FPS
high	47 FPS	55 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	47 FPS

Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Open Radeon RX 7600S

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon RX 7600S
1080p
low	301 FPS	344 FPS
medium	255 FPS	290 FPS
high	201 FPS	228 FPS
ultra	158 FPS	176 FPS
1440p
low	203 FPS	216 FPS
medium	172 FPS	183 FPS
high	146 FPS	147 FPS
ultra	112 FPS	118 FPS
4K
low	99 FPS	100 FPS
medium	82 FPS	83 FPS
high	69 FPS	71 FPS
ultra	52 FPS	54 FPS

Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Open Radeon RX 7600S

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon RX 7600S
1080p
low	703 FPS	606 FPS
medium	563 FPS	495 FPS
high	469 FPS	404 FPS
ultra	352 FPS	350 FPS
1440p
low	528 FPS	417 FPS
medium	422 FPS	358 FPS
high	352 FPS	291 FPS
ultra	264 FPS	250 FPS
4K
low	352 FPS	302 FPS
medium	281 FPS	251 FPS
high	234 FPS	187 FPS
ultra	176 FPS	142 FPS

Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Open Radeon RX 7600S

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon RX 7600S
1080p
low	321 FPS	535 FPS
medium	279 FPS	456 FPS
high	243 FPS	391 FPS
ultra	183 FPS	322 FPS
1440p
low	237 FPS	438 FPS
medium	212 FPS	373 FPS
high	185 FPS	303 FPS
ultra	137 FPS	247 FPS
4K
low	142 FPS	274 FPS
medium	125 FPS	254 FPS
high	101 FPS	219 FPS
ultra	78 FPS	175 FPS

Open Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU Open Radeon RX 7600S

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU and Radeon RX 7600S

Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 26 2018. It features the GCN 5.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1000 MHz to 1500 MHz. It has 3584 ×2 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 300W. Manufactured using 14 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,633 points.

Radeon RX 7600S

The Radeon RX 7600S is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 2200 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 75W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 15,553 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU scores 15,633 and the Radeon RX 7600S reaches 15,553 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 0.5% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU is built on GCN 5.0 while the Radeon RX 7600S uses RDNA 3.0, both on 14 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 3,584 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 7600S). Raw compute: 10.75 TFLOPS ×2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 15.77 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600S). Boost clocks: 1500 MHz vs 2200 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon RX 7600S
G3D Mark Score	15,633	15,553
Architecture	GCN 5.0	RDNA 3.0
Process Node	14 nm	6 nm
Shading Units	3584 ×2+100%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	10.75 TFLOPS ×2	15.77 TFLOPS+47%
Boost Clock	1500 MHz	2200 MHz+47%
ROPs	64 ×2	64
TMUs	224 ×2+100%	112
L1 Cache	896 KB+75%	512 KB
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling	FSR 3 + AFMF

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600S is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon RX 7600S
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU comes with 32 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon RX 7600S has 8 GB. The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU offers 300% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600S) — the Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon RX 7600S
VRAM Capacity	32 GB+300%	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.2 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (Radeon RX 7600S). Vulkan: 1.3 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 0 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon RX 7600S
DirectX	12.2+2%	12 Ultimate (12_2)
Vulkan	1.3	1.3
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	0	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 3.0 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600S). Decoder: VCN 3.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7600S).

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon RX 7600S
Encoder	VCN 3.0	VCN 4.0
Decoder	VCN 3.0	VCN 4.0
Codecs	MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1	H.264,H.265/HEVC,AV1,VP9

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU draws 300W versus the Radeon RX 7600S's 75W — a 120% difference. The Radeon RX 7600S is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 650W (Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU) vs 650W (Radeon RX 7600S). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.

Feature	Radeon Pro V620 MxGPU	Radeon RX 7600S
TDP	300W	75W-75%
Recommended PSU	650W	650W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	1-50%
Temp (Load)	75°C-12%	85°C
Perf/Watt	52.1	207.4+298%