
Radeon Pro W5700
Popular choices:

Radeon RX 7600M XT
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
Radeon Pro W5700
2019Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600M XT across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7600M XT is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌142.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 44.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Radeon RX 7600M XT
2023Why buy it
- ✅23.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $470 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 147.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.6 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Radeon Pro W5700
2019Radeon RX 7600M XT
2023Why buy it
- ✅Competitive enough if your priority is price, power, or specific feature preference.
Why buy it
- ✅23.3% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Costs $470 less on MSRP ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 147.7% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 44.6 vs 18.0 G3D/$ ($329 MSRP vs $799 MSRP).
- ✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 7600M XT across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
- ❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 7600M XT is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
- ❌142.9% HIGHER MSRP$799 MSRPvs$329 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 18.0 vs 44.6 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs $329 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Fewer clear downsides in this head-to-head, aside from the usual pricing and availability swings.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon RX 7600M XT better than Radeon Pro W5700?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is Radeon Pro W5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 150 FPS | 159 FPS |
| medium | 132 FPS | 140 FPS |
| high | 113 FPS | 121 FPS |
| ultra | 95 FPS | 101 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 127 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 104 FPS | 109 FPS |
| high | 88 FPS | 93 FPS |
| ultra | 76 FPS | 80 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 74 FPS | 78 FPS |
| medium | 62 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 47 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 226 FPS | 321 FPS |
| medium | 190 FPS | 279 FPS |
| high | 138 FPS | 226 FPS |
| ultra | 99 FPS | 186 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 146 FPS | 216 FPS |
| medium | 122 FPS | 186 FPS |
| high | 93 FPS | 148 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 78 FPS | 101 FPS |
| medium | 66 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 54 FPS | 70 FPS |
| ultra | 39 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 647 FPS | 660 FPS |
| medium | 518 FPS | 528 FPS |
| high | 431 FPS | 440 FPS |
| ultra | 324 FPS | 330 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 485 FPS | 495 FPS |
| medium | 388 FPS | 396 FPS |
| high | 324 FPS | 330 FPS |
| ultra | 243 FPS | 248 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 324 FPS | 330 FPS |
| medium | 259 FPS | 264 FPS |
| high | 216 FPS | 220 FPS |
| ultra | 162 FPS | 165 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 332 FPS | 431 FPS |
| medium | 284 FPS | 378 FPS |
| high | 235 FPS | 321 FPS |
| ultra | 196 FPS | 250 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 275 FPS | 334 FPS |
| medium | 236 FPS | 293 FPS |
| high | 181 FPS | 240 FPS |
| ultra | 146 FPS | 187 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 147 FPS | 217 FPS |
| medium | 116 FPS | 200 FPS |
| high | 101 FPS | 163 FPS |
| ultra | 84 FPS | 132 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5700 and Radeon RX 7600M XT

Radeon Pro W5700
Radeon Pro W5700
The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX 7600M XT
Radeon RX 7600M XT
The Radeon RX 7600M XT is manufactured by AMD. It was released in January 4 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1280 MHz to 2469 MHz. It has 2048 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 120W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 32 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,669 points.
Graphics Performance
The Radeon Pro W5700 scores 14,380 and the Radeon RX 7600M XT reaches 14,669 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 2% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon RX 7600M XT uses RDNA 3.0, both on 7 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 2,048 (Radeon RX 7600M XT). Raw compute: 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 20.23 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 7600M XT). Boost clocks: 1930 MHz vs 2469 MHz.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 14,380 | 14,669+2% |
| Architecture | RDNA 1.0 | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 7 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 2304+13% | 2048 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 8.893 TFLOPS | 20.23 TFLOPS+127% |
| Boost Clock | 1930 MHz | 2469 MHz+28% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 144+13% | 128 |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
| Frame Generation | FSR upscaling + RSR | FSR 3 + AFMF |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 7600M XT is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro W5700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 | FSR 3 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | FSR Frame Generation + AFMF |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | AMD Anti-Lag | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 7600M XT) — the Radeon Pro W5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR6 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 128-bit | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 4 MB+100% | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 12 Ultimate (Radeon RX 7600M XT). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.0 | 12 Ultimate |
| Vulkan | 1.1 | 1.3+18% |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 6+50% | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon RX 7600M XT). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 (Radeon RX 7600M XT).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | VCN 2.0 | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265,VP9 | H.264,H.265,AV1,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The Radeon Pro W5700 draws 205W versus the Radeon RX 7600M XT's 120W — a 52.3% difference. The Radeon RX 7600M XT is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 500W (Radeon RX 7600M XT). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile. Card length: 267mm vs 0mm, occupying 2 vs 0 slots. Typical load temperature: 85°C vs 85.
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 205W | 120W-41% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | PCIe-powered | Mobile |
| Length | 267mm | 0mm |
| Height | 111mm | 0mm |
| Slots | 2 | 0-100% |
| Temp (Load) | 85°C | 85 |
| Perf/Watt | 70.1 | 122.2+74% |
Value Analysis
The Radeon Pro W5700 launched at $799 MSRP, while the Radeon RX 7600M XT launched at $329. The Radeon RX 7600M XT costs 58.8% less ($470 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 18.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 44.6 (Radeon RX 7600M XT) — the Radeon RX 7600M XT offers 147.8% better value. The Radeon RX 7600M XT is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2019).
| Feature | Radeon Pro W5700 | Radeon RX 7600M XT |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $799 | $329-59% |
| Performance per Dollar | 18.0 | 44.6+148% |
| Codename | Navi 10 | Navi 33 |
| Release | November 19 2019 | January 4 2023 |
| Ranking | #163 | #160 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













