Radeon Pro W5700 vs Radeon RX 6600M

G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.

Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook

This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.

Radeon Pro W5700

2019

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6600M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌105% higher power demand at 205W vs 100W.

Radeon RX 6600M

2021

Why buy it

✅20.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 100W instead of 205W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Radeon Pro W5700

2019

Radeon RX 6600M

2021

Why buy it

✅Delivers 100+% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 18.0 vs 0 G3D/$ ($799 MSRP vs Unknown MSRP).

Why buy it

✅20.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
✅Access to a newer frame-generation stack with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
✅More future proof: RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025) on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
✅Draws 100W instead of 205W, a 105W reduction.

Trade-offs

❌Lower average FPS than Radeon RX 6600M across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
❌No equivalent frame-generation stack like FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023).
❌Weaker long-term outlook: Radeon RX 6600M is the safer future-proof pick thanks to newer hardware and better gaming feature support.
❌105% higher power demand at 205W vs 100W.

Trade-offs

❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 0 vs 18.0 G3D/$ (Unknown MSRP vs $799 MSRP).

Quick Answers

So, is Radeon RX 6600M better than Radeon Pro W5700?

Yes. Radeon RX 6600M is the better GPU overall here. You are getting 20.8% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and 3.3% higher PassMark G3D performance. It also comes from 2021 instead of 2019, which helps its case as the more complete modern gaming card.

Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?

Radeon RX 6600M is the more future-proof choice for 2026 and beyond. You are getting a newer 2021 generation instead of 2019 and better frame-generation support with FSR Frame Generation + AFMF (2023) instead of FSR upscaling. That broader feature stack should age better as more games lean on modern upscaling and frame-generation support.

Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?

Radeon RX 6600M is priced in an unclear MSRP range at an unclear MSRP versus $799 MSRP, and you are getting 20.8% more estimated average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data and a lower G3D Mark (13,922 vs 14,380). Radeon Pro W5700 still holds the G3D-per-dollar lead, so the performance win comes with a real value premium. If you are comfortable paying the premium for the stronger gaming result, Radeon RX 6600M is the one to buy. If staying closer to budget matters more, Radeon Pro W5700 still makes more sense on price alone and remains capable enough for modern gaming.

Is Radeon Pro W5700 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?

Yes. Radeon Pro W5700 is still a strong gaming GPU in 2026: it is very strong for 1080p, good for 1440p, and more limited at 4K. This mostly comes down to price. If you want to stay closer to $799 MSRP, it remains a strong choice; if you are comfortable paying more, Radeon RX 6600M earns that extra money with a clearly stronger gaming result and a more complete overall package.

Games Benchmarks

Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.

Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Radeon Pro W5700 Benchmark Check

Radeon RX 6600M Benchmark Check

Path of Exile 2

Preset	Radeon Pro W5700	Radeon RX 6600M
1080p
low	150 FPS	167 FPS
medium	132 FPS	148 FPS
high	113 FPS	131 FPS
ultra	95 FPS	111 FPS
1440p
low	127 FPS	140 FPS
medium	104 FPS	113 FPS
high	88 FPS	101 FPS
ultra	76 FPS	91 FPS
4K
low	74 FPS	84 FPS
medium	62 FPS	71 FPS
high	47 FPS	58 FPS
ultra	41 FPS	50 FPS

Open Radeon Pro W5700 Open Radeon RX 6600M

Path of Exile 2

Path of Exile 2

Counter-Strike 2

Preset	Radeon Pro W5700	Radeon RX 6600M
1080p
low	226 FPS	300 FPS
medium	190 FPS	250 FPS
high	138 FPS	196 FPS
ultra	99 FPS	154 FPS
1440p
low	146 FPS	192 FPS
medium	122 FPS	160 FPS
high	93 FPS	127 FPS
ultra	67 FPS	102 FPS
4K
low	78 FPS	104 FPS
medium	66 FPS	86 FPS
high	54 FPS	73 FPS
ultra	39 FPS	55 FPS

Open Radeon Pro W5700 Open Radeon RX 6600M

Counter-Strike 2

Counter-Strike 2

League of Legends

Preset	Radeon Pro W5700	Radeon RX 6600M
1080p
low	647 FPS	626 FPS
medium	518 FPS	501 FPS
high	431 FPS	418 FPS
ultra	324 FPS	313 FPS
1440p
low	485 FPS	470 FPS
medium	388 FPS	376 FPS
high	324 FPS	313 FPS
ultra	243 FPS	235 FPS
4K
low	324 FPS	313 FPS
medium	259 FPS	251 FPS
high	216 FPS	206 FPS
ultra	162 FPS	157 FPS

Open Radeon Pro W5700 Open Radeon RX 6600M

League of Legends

League of Legends

Valorant

Preset	Radeon Pro W5700	Radeon RX 6600M
1080p
low	332 FPS	473 FPS
medium	284 FPS	394 FPS
high	235 FPS	330 FPS
ultra	196 FPS	277 FPS
1440p
low	275 FPS	371 FPS
medium	236 FPS	306 FPS
high	181 FPS	243 FPS
ultra	146 FPS	198 FPS
4K
low	147 FPS	212 FPS
medium	116 FPS	171 FPS
high	101 FPS	160 FPS
ultra	84 FPS	124 FPS

Open Radeon Pro W5700 Open Radeon RX 6600M

Valorant

Valorant

Check FPS for your specific build

Technical Specifications

Side-by-side comparison of Radeon Pro W5700 and Radeon RX 6600M

Radeon Pro W5700

The Radeon Pro W5700 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in November 19 2019. It features the RDNA 1.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1243 MHz to 1930 MHz. It has 2304 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 205W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 14,380 points. Launch price was $799.

Radeon RX 6600M

The Radeon RX 6600M is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 31 2021. It features the RDNA 2.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 2068 MHz to 2416 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 100W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,922 points.

⚡

Graphics Performance

The Radeon Pro W5700 scores 14,380 and the Radeon RX 6600M reaches 13,922 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 3.3% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The Radeon Pro W5700 is built on RDNA 1.0 while the Radeon RX 6600M uses RDNA 2.0, both on a 7 nm process. Shader units: 2,304 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 1,792 (Radeon RX 6600M). Raw compute: 8.893 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 8.659 TFLOPS (Radeon RX 6600M). Boost clocks: 1930 MHz vs 2416 MHz.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	Radeon RX 6600M
G3D Mark Score	14,380+3%	13,922
Architecture	RDNA 1.0	RDNA 2.0
Process Node	7 nm	7 nm
Shading Units	2304+29%	1792
Compute (TFLOPS)	8.893 TFLOPS+3%	8.659 TFLOPS
Boost Clock	1930 MHz	2416 MHz+25%
ROPs	64	64
TMUs	144+29%	112
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB
Frame Generation	FSR upscaling + RSR	FSR 3 + AFMF

✨

Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)

A critical advantage for the Radeon RX 6600M is support for FSR Frame Generation + AFMF. This allows it to generate entire frames using AI/Algorithms, essentially doubling the frame rate in CPU-bound scenarios or heavy ray-tracing titles. The Radeon Pro W5700 lacks specific hardware/driver support for this native frame generation tier.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	Radeon RX 6600M
Upscaling Tech	FSR Upscaling / FSR 4	FSR 3
Frame Generation	Not Supported	FSR Frame Generation + AFMF
Ray Reconstruction	No	No
Low Latency	AMD Anti-Lag	AMD Anti-Lag

💾

Video Memory (VRAM)

Both cards feature 8 GB of GDDR6. Bus width: 128-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 4 MB (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 2 MB (Radeon RX 6600M) — the Radeon Pro W5700 has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	Radeon RX 6600M
VRAM Capacity	8 GB	8 GB
Memory Type	GDDR6	GDDR6
Bus Width	128-bit	128-bit
L2 Cache	4 MB+100%	2 MB

🖥️

Display & API Support

DirectX support: 12.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 12 (FL 12_2) (Radeon RX 6600M). Vulkan: 1.1 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 6 vs 4.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	Radeon RX 6600M
DirectX	12.0	12 (FL 12_2)
Vulkan	1.1	1.3+18%
OpenGL	4.6	4.6
Max Displays	6+50%	4

🎬

Media & Encoding

Hardware encoder: VCN 2.0 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs VCN 3.0 (Radeon RX 6600M). Decoder: VCN 2.0 vs VCN 3.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265,VP9 (Radeon Pro W5700) vs H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon RX 6600M).

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	Radeon RX 6600M
Encoder	VCN 2.0	VCN 3.0
Decoder	VCN 2.0	VCN 3.0
Codecs	H.264,H.265,VP9	H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1

🔌

Power & Dimensions

The Radeon Pro W5700 draws 205W versus the Radeon RX 6600M's 100W — a 68.9% difference. The Radeon RX 6600M is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (Radeon Pro W5700) vs 500W (Radeon RX 6600M). Power connectors: PCIe-powered vs Mobile.

Feature	Radeon Pro W5700	Radeon RX 6600M
TDP	205W	100W-51%
Recommended PSU	500W	500W
Power Connector	PCIe-powered	Mobile
Length	267mm	—
Height	111mm	—
Slots	2	0-100%
Temp (Load)	85°C	—
Perf/Watt	70.1	139.2+99%