
GeForce GTX 1070
Popular choices:

Radeon PRO W7500
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1070
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.6 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7500 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 70W.
- ❌23.6% longer card at 267mm vs 216mm.
Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅7.1% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 150W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 216mm instead of 267mm, a 51mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌13.2% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 35.6 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
GeForce GTX 1070
2016Radeon PRO W7500
2023Why buy it
- ✅Costs $50 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 15% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.6 vs 31.0 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $429 MSRP).
Why buy it
- ✅7.1% more average FPS across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅More future proof: RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026) on 6nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Draws 70W instead of 150W, a 80W reduction.
- ✅Measures 216mm instead of 267mm, a 51mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon PRO W7500 across 49 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌114.3% higher power demand at 150W vs 70W.
- ❌23.6% longer card at 267mm vs 216mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌13.2% HIGHER MSRP$429 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 31.0 vs 35.6 G3D/$ ($429 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon PRO W7500 better than GeForce GTX 1070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1070 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 136 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 119 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 104 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 85 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 122 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 101 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 86 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 73 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 66 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 58 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 40 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 34 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 339 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 284 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 224 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 174 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 212 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 179 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 142 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 114 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 99 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 83 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 69 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 53 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 608 FPS | 598 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 479 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 399 FPS |
| ultra | 304 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 414 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 356 FPS |
| high | 304 FPS | 291 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 304 FPS | 299 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 187 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 141 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 395 FPS | 522 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 453 FPS |
| high | 278 FPS | 386 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 299 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 328 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 275 FPS | 359 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 267 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 150 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 and Radeon PRO W7500

GeForce GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070
The GeForce GTX 1070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,507 points. Launch price was $379.

Radeon PRO W7500
Radeon PRO W7500
The Radeon PRO W7500 is manufactured by AMD. It was released in August 3 2023. It features the RDNA 3.0 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1500 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 1792 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 70W. Manufactured using 6 nm process technology. It features 28 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,298 points. Launch price was $429.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1070 scores 13,507 and the Radeon PRO W7500 reaches 13,298 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.6% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 is built on Pascal while the Radeon PRO W7500 uses RDNA 3.0, both on 16 nm vs 6 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 1,792 (Radeon PRO W7500). Raw compute: 6.463 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 12.19 TFLOPS (Radeon PRO W7500). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 1700 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,507+2% | 13,298 |
| Architecture | Pascal | RDNA 3.0 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 6 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920+7% | 1792 |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.463 TFLOPS | 12.19 TFLOPS+89% |
| Boost Clock | 1683 MHz | 1700 MHz+1% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 120+7% | 112 |
| L1 Cache | 720 KB+41% | 512 KB |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon PRO W7500 relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 2 MB |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 12.2 (Radeon PRO W7500). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.2 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1070) vs VCN 4.0 (Radeon PRO W7500). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs VCN 4.0. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 (Radeon PRO W7500).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | VCN 4.0 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 draws 150W versus the Radeon PRO W7500's 70W — a 72.7% difference. The Radeon PRO W7500 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 500W (Radeon PRO W7500). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 216mm, occupying 2 vs 1 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W | 70W-53% |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 216mm |
| Height | 112mm | 115mm |
| Slots | 2 | 1-50% |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.0 | 190.0+111% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1070 launched at $379 MSRP, while the Radeon PRO W7500 launched at $429. The GeForce GTX 1070 costs 11.7% less ($50 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.6 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 31.0 (Radeon PRO W7500) — the GeForce GTX 1070 offers 14.8% better value. The Radeon PRO W7500 is the newer GPU (2023 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon PRO W7500 |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379-12% | $429 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.6+15% | 31.0 |
| Codename | GP104 | Navi 33 |
| Release | June 10 2016 | August 3 2023 |
| Ranking | #185 | #192 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













