
GeForce GTX 1070
Popular choices:

Radeon Pro VII
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1070
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,520 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 410.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.6 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 305mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro VII across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Radeon Pro VII
2020Why buy it
- ✅26.3% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Vega 20 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌401.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,899 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 35.6 G3D/$ ($1,899 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
- ❌14.2% longer card at 305mm vs 267mm.
GeForce GTX 1070
2016Radeon Pro VII
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $1,520 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ✅Delivers 410.2% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 35.6 vs 7.0 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $1,899 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 250W, a 100W reduction.
- ✅Measures 267mm instead of 305mm, a 38mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Why buy it
- ✅26.3% more average FPS across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅100% more VRAM for high-resolution textures and newer games (16 GB vs 8 GB).
- ✅More future proof: Vega 20 on 7nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than Radeon Pro VII across 48 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌Less VRAM, with 8 GB vs 16 GB for high-resolution textures and newer games.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
Trade-offs
- ❌401.1% HIGHER MSRP$1,899 MSRPvs$379 MSRP
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 7.0 vs 35.6 G3D/$ ($1,899 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ❌66.7% higher power demand at 250W vs 150W.
- ❌14.2% longer card at 305mm vs 267mm.
Quick Answers
So, is Radeon Pro VII better than GeForce GTX 1070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1070 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 199 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 184 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 160 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 146 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 185 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 154 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 128 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 119 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 118 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 99 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 75 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 69 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 340 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 298 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 225 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 173 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 215 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 185 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 152 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 120 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 102 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 86 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 74 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 57 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 608 FPS | 597 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 478 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 398 FPS |
| ultra | 304 FPS | 298 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 448 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 304 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 304 FPS | 298 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 149 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 395 FPS | 525 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 452 FPS |
| high | 278 FPS | 388 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 298 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 328 FPS | 426 FPS |
| medium | 275 FPS | 358 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 298 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 224 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 263 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 239 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 199 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 149 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 and Radeon Pro VII

GeForce GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070
The GeForce GTX 1070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,507 points. Launch price was $379.

Radeon Pro VII
Radeon Pro VII
The Radeon Pro VII is manufactured by AMD. It was released in May 13 2020. It features the GCN 5.1 architecture. The core clock ranges from 1400 MHz to 1700 MHz. It has 3840 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 250W. Manufactured using 7 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,264 points. Launch price was $1,899.
Graphics Performance
The GeForce GTX 1070 scores 13,507 and the Radeon Pro VII reaches 13,264 in the G3D Mark benchmark — just a 1.8% difference, making them near-identical in rasterization performance. The GeForce GTX 1070 is built on Pascal while the Radeon Pro VII uses GCN 5.1, both on 16 nm vs 7 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 3,840 (Radeon Pro VII). Raw compute: 6.463 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 13.06 TFLOPS (Radeon Pro VII). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 1700 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,507+2% | 13,264 |
| Architecture | Pascal | GCN 5.1 |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 7 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 3840+100% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.463 TFLOPS | 13.06 TFLOPS+102% |
| Boost Clock | 1683 MHz | 1700 MHz+1% |
| ROPs | 64 | 64 |
| TMUs | 120 | 240+100% |
| L1 Cache | 720 KB | 960 KB+33% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce GTX 1070 gives access to NVIDIA DLSS (Deep Learning Super Sampling), widely regarding as the superior upscaling method for image quality. The Radeon Pro VII relies on FSR (FidelityFX Super Resolution), which is capable but generally slightly noisier than DLSS in motion.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | FSR Upscaling / FSR 4 |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | AMD Anti-Lag |
Video Memory (VRAM)
The GeForce GTX 1070 comes with 8 GB of VRAM, while the Radeon Pro VII has 16 GB. The Radeon Pro VII offers 100% more capacity, crucial for higher resolutions and texture-heavy games. Bus width: 256-bit vs 128-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 4 MB (Radeon Pro VII) — the Radeon Pro VII has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 16 GB+100% |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Bus Width | 256-bit+100% | 128-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 12.1 (Radeon Pro VII). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 6.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12.1 |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 6+50% |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1070) vs VCE 4.1 (Radeon Pro VII). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs UVD 7.2. Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 (Radeon Pro VII).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | VCE 4.1 |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | UVD 7.2 |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | MPEG-2,H.264,HEVC,VP9 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 draws 150W versus the Radeon Pro VII's 250W — a 50% difference. The GeForce GTX 1070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 500W (Radeon Pro VII). Power connectors: 8-pin vs PCIe-powered. Card length: 267mm vs 305mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 85°C.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-40% | 250W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W | 500W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | PCIe-powered |
| Length | 267mm | 305mm |
| Height | 112mm | 111mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C-12% | 85°C |
| Perf/Watt | 90.0+69% | 53.1 |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1070 launched at $379 MSRP, while the Radeon Pro VII launched at $1899. The GeForce GTX 1070 costs 80% less ($1520 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.6 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 7.0 (Radeon Pro VII) — the GeForce GTX 1070 offers 408.6% better value. The Radeon Pro VII is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | Radeon Pro VII |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379-80% | $1899 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.6+409% | 7.0 |
| Codename | GP104 | Vega 20 |
| Release | June 10 2016 | May 13 2020 |
| Ranking | #185 | #194 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













