
GeForce GTX 1070
Popular choices:

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
Popular choices:
Performance Spectrum - GPU
About G3D Mark
G3D Mark is a standard benchmark that measures graphics performance in real-world gaming scenarios. It simplifies comparing cards from different brands, where higher scores directly correlate with better fps and smoother gaming experiences.
Head-to-Head Verdict, Benchmarks, Value & Long-Term Outlook
This comparison brings together gaming FPS, raw graphics performance, VRAM, feature set, power efficiency, pricing context, and long-term value so you can see which GPU actually makes more sense.
GeForce GTX 1070
2016Why buy it
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 35.6 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅50.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 42.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 35.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
GeForce GTX 1070
2016GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
2020Why buy it
- ✅Costs $20 less on MSRP ($379 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ✅Draws 150W instead of 200W, a 50W reduction.
Why buy it
- ✅50.2% more average FPS across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ✅Delivers 42.8% more G3D Mark for each dollar spent, at 50.9 vs 35.6 G3D/$ ($399 MSRP vs $379 MSRP).
- ✅Access to DLSS 2 Super Resolution (2020).
- ✅More future proof: Ampere (2020−2025) on 8nm with a newer platform for upcoming games.
- ✅Measures 242mm instead of 267mm, a 25mm shorter card that is more SFF-friendly.
Trade-offs
- ❌Lower average FPS than GeForce RTX 3060 Ti across 50 tracked games in our benchmark data.
- ❌No DLSS support; it relies on Upscaling support instead.
- ❌Poor future-proofing: 2016-era hardware with 8 GB of VRAM is already a legacy-tier option for modern games.
- ❌Lower G3D Mark per dollar, at 35.6 vs 50.9 G3D/$ ($379 MSRP vs $399 MSRP).
- ❌10.3% longer card at 267mm vs 242mm.
Trade-offs
- ❌33.3% higher power demand at 200W vs 150W.
Quick Answers
So, is GeForce RTX 3060 Ti better than GeForce GTX 1070?
Which one is more future-proof for 2026 and beyond?
Which one is the smarter buy today, not just the cheaper card?
Is GeForce GTX 1070 still worth buying for gaming in 2026?
Games Benchmarks
Real-world benchmarks and performance projections based on comprehensive hardware analysis and comparative metrics. Values represent expected performance on High/Ultra settings at 1080p, 1440p, and 4K. Modeled using a Ryzen 7 9800X3D reference profile to minimize specific CPU bottlenecks.
Note: Performance behavior can vary per game. Specific architectures may perform better or worse depending on game engine optimizations and API implementation.

Path of Exile 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 143 FPS | 152 FPS |
| medium | 128 FPS | 137 FPS |
| high | 111 FPS | 118 FPS |
| ultra | 93 FPS | 100 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 123 FPS | 131 FPS |
| medium | 103 FPS | 107 FPS |
| high | 89 FPS | 91 FPS |
| ultra | 78 FPS | 82 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 65 FPS | 77 FPS |
| medium | 57 FPS | 65 FPS |
| high | 39 FPS | 50 FPS |
| ultra | 33 FPS | 43 FPS |

Counter-Strike 2
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 210 FPS | 425 FPS |
| medium | 176 FPS | 366 FPS |
| high | 145 FPS | 296 FPS |
| ultra | 110 FPS | 248 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 132 FPS | 272 FPS |
| medium | 106 FPS | 229 FPS |
| high | 86 FPS | 190 FPS |
| ultra | 67 FPS | 156 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 61 FPS | 133 FPS |
| medium | 51 FPS | 114 FPS |
| high | 48 FPS | 96 FPS |
| ultra | 41 FPS | 73 FPS |

League of Legends
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 608 FPS | 859 FPS |
| medium | 486 FPS | 693 FPS |
| high | 405 FPS | 602 FPS |
| ultra | 304 FPS | 457 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 456 FPS | 658 FPS |
| medium | 365 FPS | 529 FPS |
| high | 304 FPS | 452 FPS |
| ultra | 228 FPS | 343 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 304 FPS | 434 FPS |
| medium | 243 FPS | 346 FPS |
| high | 203 FPS | 275 FPS |
| ultra | 152 FPS | 221 FPS |

Valorant
| Preset | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| 1080p | ||
| low | 395 FPS | 580 FPS |
| medium | 332 FPS | 514 FPS |
| high | 278 FPS | 424 FPS |
| ultra | 237 FPS | 373 FPS |
| 1440p | ||
| low | 328 FPS | 478 FPS |
| medium | 275 FPS | 427 FPS |
| high | 217 FPS | 335 FPS |
| ultra | 178 FPS | 290 FPS |
| 4K | ||
| low | 177 FPS | 285 FPS |
| medium | 139 FPS | 266 FPS |
| high | 127 FPS | 234 FPS |
| ultra | 104 FPS | 195 FPS |
Technical Specifications
Side-by-side comparison of GeForce GTX 1070 and GeForce RTX 3060 Ti

GeForce GTX 1070
GeForce GTX 1070
The GeForce GTX 1070 is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in June 10 2016. It features the Pascal architecture. The core clock ranges from 1506 MHz to 1683 MHz. It has 1920 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 150W. Manufactured using 16 nm process technology. G3D Mark benchmark score: 13,507 points. Launch price was $379.

GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
GeForce RTX 3060 Ti
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is manufactured by NVIDIA. It was released in December 1 2020. It features the Ampere architecture. The core clock ranges from 1410 MHz to 1665 MHz. It has 4864 shading units. The thermal design power (TDP) is 200W. Manufactured using 8 nm process technology. It features 38 dedicated ray tracing cores for enhanced lighting effects. G3D Mark benchmark score: 20,312 points. Launch price was $399.
Graphics Performance
In G3D Mark, the GeForce GTX 1070 scores 13,507 versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 20,312 — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti leads by 50.4%. The GeForce GTX 1070 is built on Pascal while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti uses Ampere, both on 16 nm vs 8 nm. Shader units: 1,920 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 4,864 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Raw compute: 6.463 TFLOPS (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 16.2 TFLOPS (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Boost clocks: 1683 MHz vs 1665 MHz.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| G3D Mark Score | 13,507 | 20,312+50% |
| Architecture | Pascal | Ampere |
| Process Node | 16 nm | 8 nm |
| Shading Units | 1920 | 4864+153% |
| Compute (TFLOPS) | 6.463 TFLOPS | 16.2 TFLOPS+151% |
| Boost Clock | 1683 MHz+1% | 1665 MHz |
| ROPs | 64 | 80+25% |
| TMUs | 120 | 152+27% |
| L1 Cache | 0.7 MB | 4.8 MB+586% |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Advanced Features (DLSS/FSR)
The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti supports the newer DLSS 2 Super Resolution, whereas the GeForce GTX 1070 is capped at Upscaling support.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Upscaling Tech | Upscaling support | DLSS 2 Super Resolution |
| Frame Generation | Not Supported | Not Supported |
| Ray Reconstruction | No | No |
| Low Latency | NVIDIA Reflex | NVIDIA Reflex |
Video Memory (VRAM)
Both cards feature 8 GB of video memory. Memory bandwidth: 256 GB/s (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 448 GB/s (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — a 75% advantage for the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti. Bus width: 256-bit vs 256-bit. L2 Cache: 2 MB (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 4 MB (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti has significantly larger on-die cache to reduce VRAM reliance.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| VRAM Capacity | 8 GB | 8 GB |
| Memory Type | GDDR5 | GDDR6 |
| Memory Bandwidth | 256 GB/s | 448 GB/s+75% |
| Bus Width | 256-bit | 256-bit |
| L2 Cache | 2 MB | 4 MB+100% |
Display & API Support
DirectX support: 12.1 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 12 Ultimate (12_2) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Vulkan: 1.4 vs 1.3. OpenGL: 4.6 vs 4.6. Maximum simultaneous displays: 4 vs 4.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| DirectX | 12.1 | 12 Ultimate (12_2) |
| Vulkan | 1.4+8% | 1.3 |
| OpenGL | 4.6 | 4.6 |
| Max Displays | 4 | 4 |
Media & Encoding
Hardware encoder: NVENC 6th gen (GeForce GTX 1070) vs NVENC (Ampere) (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Decoder: NVDEC 3rd gen vs NVDEC (Ampere). Supported codecs: H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| Encoder | NVENC 6th gen | NVENC (Ampere) |
| Decoder | NVDEC 3rd gen | NVDEC (Ampere) |
| Codecs | H.264,H.265/HEVC,VP8,VP9,MPEG-2,VC-1 | H.264,H.265,VP9,AV1 |
Power & Dimensions
The GeForce GTX 1070 draws 150W versus the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti's 200W — a 28.6% difference. The GeForce GTX 1070 is more power-efficient. Recommended PSU: 500W (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 600W (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti). Power connectors: 8-pin vs 8-pin. Card length: 267mm vs 242mm, occupying 2 vs 2 slots. Typical load temperature: 75°C vs 75.
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| TDP | 150W-25% | 200W |
| Recommended PSU | 500W-17% | 600W |
| Power Connector | 8-pin | 8-pin |
| Length | 267mm | 242mm |
| Height | 112mm | 112mm |
| Slots | 2 | 2 |
| Temp (Load) | 75°C | 75 |
| Perf/Watt | 90.0 | 101.6+13% |
Value Analysis
The GeForce GTX 1070 launched at $379 MSRP, while the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti launched at $399. The GeForce GTX 1070 costs 5% less ($20 savings) on MSRP. Performance per dollar on MSRP (G3D Mark / MSRP): 35.6 (GeForce GTX 1070) vs 50.9 (GeForce RTX 3060 Ti) — the GeForce RTX 3060 Ti offers 43% better value. The GeForce RTX 3060 Ti is the newer GPU (2020 vs 2016).
| Feature | GeForce GTX 1070 | GeForce RTX 3060 Ti |
|---|---|---|
| MSRP | $379-5% | $399 |
| Performance per Dollar | 35.6 | 50.9+43% |
| Codename | GP104 | GA104 |
| Release | June 10 2016 | December 1 2020 |
| Ranking | #185 | #73 |
Top Performing GPUs
The most powerful gpus ranked by G3D Mark benchmark scores.













